How to appraise a diagnostic test

被引:17
作者
Bhandari, M [1 ]
Guyatt, GH [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00268-005-7913-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinicians frequently confront challenges when using diagnostic tests to help them decide whether the patient before them suffers from a particular target condition or diagnosis. The primary issues to consider when determining the validity of a diagnostic test study are how the authors assembled the patients and whether they used an appropriate reference standard in all patients to determine whether the patients did or did not have the target condition. Surgeons should be interested in the characteristics of the test that indicates the direction and magnitude of change in the probability of the target condition associated with a particular test result. The likelihood ratio best captures the link between the pretest probability of the target condition and the probability after the test results are obtained (also called the posttest probability). Many studies, however, present the properties of diagnostic tests in less clinically useful terms: sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity denotes the proportion of people with the disorder in whom the test result is positive. Specificity denotes the proportion of people without the disorder in whom the test result is negative. Application of the guides presented in this article can allow surgeons to assess critically studies regarding a diagnostic test.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 566
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS WHEN DISEASE VERIFICATION IS SUBJECT TO SELECTION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
GREENES, RA .
BIOMETRICS, 1983, 39 (01) :207-215
[3]
FAGAN TJ, 1975, NEW ENGL J MED, V293, P257
[4]
CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN [J].
FLETCHER, RH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 104 (01) :66-73
[5]
CONSTRUCTION OF RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES WHEN DISEASE VERIFICATION IS SUBJECT TO SELECTION BIAS [J].
GRAY, R ;
BEGG, CB ;
GREENES, RA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1984, 4 (02) :151-164
[6]
THE VALUE OF FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH NODULAR THYROID-DISEASE DIVIDED INTO GROUPS OF SUSPICION OF MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS ON CLINICAL GROUNDS [J].
HAMMING, JF ;
GOSLINGS, BM ;
VANSTEENIS, GJ ;
CLAASEN, HV ;
HERMANS, J ;
VANDEVELDE, CJH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 150 (01) :113-116
[7]
Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. [J].
Hoffman, JR ;
Mower, WR ;
Wolfson, AB ;
Todd, KH ;
Zucker, MI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (02) :94-99
[8]
USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .3. HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST .A. ARE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY VALID [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
GUYATT, G ;
SACKETT, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :389-391
[9]
Kawasaki M, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P157
[10]
Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests [J].
Lijmer, JG ;
Mol, BW ;
Heisterkamp, S ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Prins, MH ;
van der Meulen, JHP ;
Bossuyt, PMM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (11) :1061-1066