The influence of chilling rate and fat cover on beef quality

被引:46
作者
Aalhus, JL
Janz, JAM
Tong, AKW
Jones, SDM
Robertson, WM
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lacombe Res Ctr, Meat Res Stn, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Agr Food & Nutr Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge Res Ctr, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
关键词
beef quality; blast chilling; electrical stimulation; fat thickness;
D O I
10.4141/A00-084
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The economic advantages of rapid carcass chilling include reduced cooling time, increased carcass processing rate, and decreased shrink and drip losses; however, it may also reduce subsequent meat tenderness, especially in lean carcasses. The present study examined the effects of blast chilling and electrical stimulation on quality of longissimus lumborum (LL) and semimembranosus muscles from carcasses with a wide range in backfat thickness (0 to 69 mm). Despite promoting a wide range in postmortem pH and temperature decline, backfat thickness had a limited effect on meat quality. There was a decrease in the proportion of carcasses with very high (> 35 N cm(-2)) shear values and a tendency (P = 0.12) for the average shear force to decrease in the LL as backfat depth increased. Unexpectedly, leaner carcasses had less shrink loss than fatter carcasses under blast chill conditions. While blast chilling resulted in slightly darker, tougher meat, electrical stimulation was able to reduce these effects. Neither early postmortem pH nor temperature at 10 h was clearly associated with a pattern in shear force, although high pH(10) was associated with tough steaks. Blast chilling in combination with electrical stimulation can be recommended to industry as a means to reduce chilling times and shrink losses while producing meat quality that is as good as, or slightly superior to conventionally cooled carcasses.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 330
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   THE EFFICACY OF HIGH AND LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION UNDER DIFFERENT CHILLING REGIMES [J].
AALHUS, JL ;
JONES, SDM ;
LUTZ, S ;
BEST, DR ;
ROBERTSON, WM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1994, 74 (03) :433-442
[2]  
ALLEN CE, 1976, N CENTRAL REGIONAL R, V234
[3]  
ASGHAR A, 1982, CRC CR REV FOOD SCI, V18, P1
[4]  
Bendall J.R., 1972, MEAT CHILLING WHY
[5]   EFFECTS OF CRYOGENIC CHILLING ON BEEF CARCASS GRADE, SHRINKAGE AND PALATABILITY CHARACTERISTICS [J].
BOWLING, RA ;
DUTSON, TR ;
SMITH, GC ;
SAVELL, JW .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1987, 21 (01) :67-72
[6]  
CALKINS C R, 1979, Journal of Animal Science, V49, P214
[7]  
*CAN COUNC AN CAR, 1993, GUID CAR US EXP AN, V1
[8]  
*CANF RES, 1999, CANF STAT BRIEF
[9]   EFFECT OF WEIGHT AND FAT COVER ON CHILLING RATE OF CONVENTIONALLY PROCESSED STEER AND HEIFER CARCASSES [J].
CLIPLEF, RL ;
MCKAY, RM ;
RAHNEFELD, GW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1989, 69 (01) :261-263
[10]  
*COMM INT ECL, 1976, 18 SESS LOND UK SEPT, V36