New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials

被引:17
作者
Hofmeijer, J. [1 ]
Anema, P. C. [1 ]
van der Tweel, I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Biostat, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
randomized clinical trial; minimization; biased coin; treatment allocation; selection bias; loss of power;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: In clinical trials, patients become available for treatment sequentially. Especially in trials with a small number of patients, loss of power may become an important issue, if treatments are not allocated equally or if prognostic factors differ between the treatment groups. We present a new algorithm for sequential allocation of two treatments in small clinical trials, which is concerned with the reduction of both selection bias and imbalance. Study Design and Setting: With the algorithm, an element of chance is added to the treatment as allocated by minimization. The amount of chance depends on the actual amount of imbalance of treatment allocations of the patients already enrolled. The sensitivity to imbalance may be tuned. We performed trial simulations with different numbers of patients and prognostic factors, in which we quantified loss of power and selection bias. Results: With our method, selection bias is smaller than with minimization, and loss of power is lower than with pure randomization or treatment allocation according to a biased coin principle. Conclusion: Our method combines the conflicting aims of reduction of bias by predictability and reduction of loss of power, as a result of imbalance. The method may be of use in small trials. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1905
[2]   The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs [J].
Atkinson, AC .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2003, 4 (02) :179-193
[3]   The comparison of designs for sequential clinical trials with covariate information [J].
Atkinson, AC .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2002, 165 :349-373
[4]  
Atkinson AC, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1741, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990730)18:14<1741::AID-SIM210>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-F
[6]   DESIGN FOR THE CONTROL OF SELECTION BIAS [J].
BLACKWELL, D ;
HODGES, JL .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1957, 28 (02) :449-460
[7]   Minimization-reducing predictability for multi-centre trials whilst retaining balance within centre [J].
Brown, S ;
Thorpe, H ;
Hawkins, K ;
Brown, J .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (24) :3715-3727
[8]   FORCING A SEQUENTIAL EXPERIMENT TO BE BALANCED [J].
EFRON, B .
BIOMETRIKA, 1971, 58 (03) :403-&
[9]  
Grouin JM, 2004, STAT MED, V23, P701
[10]   Hemicraniectomy after middle cerebral artery infarction with life-threatening Edema trial (HAMLET). Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of decompressive surgery in space-occupying hemispheric infarction [J].
Hofmeijer, Jeannette ;
Amelink, G. Johan ;
Algra, Ale ;
van Gijn, Jan ;
Macleod, Malcolm R. ;
Kappelle, L. Jaap ;
van der Worp, H. Bart .
TRIALS, 2006, 7 (1)