Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope - Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load?

被引:62
作者
Cheung, MC [1 ]
Lee, F [1 ]
Yip, SKH [1 ]
Tam, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Tung Wah Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
urinary stone; ureteral stone; endoscope; lithotripsy; laser; stone load;
D O I
10.1159/000052530
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the outcome of outpatient ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URSL) for ureteral stone larger than 10 mm in longest diameter (group 1) with those less than or equal to 10 mm (group 2). Methods: 134 patients with solitary ureteral stone were treated by outpatient URSL. No exclusion criteria with regards to stone size, level or composition were applied. Semirigid ureteroscopy and holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy was performed under general anaesthesia as outpatient procedure. Radiological follow-up by intravenous urogram was performed 3 months postoperatively. Patients' demographic data, stone parameters, operative details and treatment outcome were collected prospectively and compared between the two groups. Results: Among the 134 ureteral stones, 41(31%) were larger than 10 mm. Group 1 contained more upper and middle ureteral stones than group 2 (68 vs. 40% p = 0.001). Operating time was significantly longer for group 1 (68.9 vs. 46.8 min, p<0.001) and postoperative stenting rate was higher (83 vs. 60%, p = 0.01). There was no difference between the groups in terms of 3 months stone clearance rate (92.7 vs. 91.4%, p = 0.8). Complication rate was higher in group 1 (22 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.004) especially for lower stones (46.2 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.001) but most of which were minor complications that were treated conservatively. One patient in group 1 (2.4%) developed ureteral stricture at the longstanding stone impaction site despite postoperative stenting. The stricture resolved subsequent to balloon dilatation. Conclusions: URSL can treat stones larger than 10 mm in longest diameter at all levels safely and effectively in an outpatient setting. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 708
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[11]   The "mini-perc" technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Jackman, SV ;
Docimo, SG ;
Cadeddu, JA ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Jarrett, TW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 16 (06) :371-374
[12]   Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? [J].
Maheshwari, PN ;
Oswal, AT ;
Andankar, M ;
Nanjappa, KM ;
Bansal, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (06) :441-444
[13]   Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: A guide for patient education [J].
Miller, OF ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :688-690
[14]  
PAAR NJ, 1992, J UROLOGY, V148, P1079
[15]   Endoscopy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones:: Ten years' experience [J].
Pardalidis, NP ;
Kosmaoglou, EV ;
Kapotis, CG .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (03) :161-164
[16]   Ureteral stricture formation after removal of impacted calculi [J].
Roberts, WW ;
Cadeddu, JA ;
Micali, S ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Moore, RG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :723-726
[17]   Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi [J].
Segura, JW ;
Preminger, GM ;
Assimos, DG ;
Dretler, SP ;
Kahn, RI ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Macaluso, JN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (05) :1915-1921
[18]   The holmium:YAG laser for ureteric stones [J].
Shroff, S ;
Watson, GM ;
Parikh, A ;
Thomas, R ;
Soonawalla, PF ;
Pope, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 78 (06) :836-839
[19]   ESTIMATED BLOOD-LOSS AND TRANSFUSION RATES ASSOCIATED WITH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY [J].
STOLLER, ML ;
WOLF, JS ;
STLEZIN, MA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (06) :1977-1981
[20]   Holmium:YAG lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy [J].
Teichman, JMH ;
Vassar, GJ ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Bellman, GC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (01) :17-23