Capillary electrophoresis for analyzing pesticides in fruits and vegetables using solid-phase extraction and stir-bar sorptive extraction

被引:92
作者
Juan-García, A [1 ]
Picó, Y [1 ]
Font, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Farm, Lab Bromatol & Toxicol, E-46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
关键词
food analysis; solid-phase extraction; stir-bar sorptive extraction; pesticides; micellar electrokinetic chromatography;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2004.09.028
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two procedures based on solid-phase extraction (SPE) and stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) in combination with micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC)-diode array detection (DAD) were compared for the simultaneous extraction of acrinathrin, bitertanol, cyproconazole, fludioxonil, flutriafol, myclobutanil, pyriproxyfen, and tebuconazole in lettuce, tomato, grape, and strawberry. Selectivity and resolution of the MEKC procedure were studied changing the pH and the molarity of the buffer, the type and the concentration of surfactant, and the methanol content in the mobile phase. A buffer consisting of 6 mM sodium tetraborate decahydrate with 75 mM of cholic acid sodium solution (pH 9.2) gave the best results. Linearity, extraction efficiencies and limits of quantitation (LOQs) of both extraction methods were compared. The recoveries obtained by SPE ranged from 40 to 106% with relative standard deviations (R.S.D.s) from 10 to 19% whereas by the SBSE method, the recoveries were 12-47% and the R.S.D.s 3-17%. The LOQs were much better by SPE (0.2-0.5 mg kg(-1) depending on the processed sample amount) than those obtained by SBSE (I mg kg(-1) for each compound). Advantages and disadvantages of both procedures are also discussed. As SPE is more robust, rapid, and sensitive than SBSE, its application in combination with MEKC is recommended because provided LOQs below the MRLs established, which is not always attained by SBSE. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Analyses of pesticides and their metabolites in foods and drinks [J].
Ahmed, FE .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 20 (11) :649-661
[2]  
Barwick VJ, 1999, J SCI FOOD AGR, V79, P1190, DOI [10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990701)79:9<1190::AID-JSFA348>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-B, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(19990701)79:9&lt
[4]  
1190::AID-JSFA348&gt
[5]  
3.0.CO
[6]  
2-K]
[7]   Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) in sample preparation from heterogeneous matrices: determination of pesticide residues in pear pulp at ppb (ng/g) level [J].
Bicchi, C ;
Cordero, C ;
Rubiolo, P ;
Sandra, P .
EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 216 (05) :449-456
[8]   Comparison of solid-phase microextraction and stir bar sorptive extraction for determining six organophosphorus insecticides in honey by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J].
Blasco, C ;
Fernández, M ;
Picó, Y ;
Font, G .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1030 (1-2) :77-85
[9]   Comparison of microextraction procedures to determine pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J].
Blasco, C ;
Font, G ;
Picó, Y .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 970 (1-2) :201-212
[10]  
FONG WG, 1999, PESTICIDE RESIDUES F, P1335