Multiple insect resistance in transgenic tomato plants over-expressing two families of plant proteinase inhibitors

被引:97
作者
Abdeen, A
Virgós, A
Olivella, E
Villanueva, J
Avilés, X
Gabarra, R
Prat, S
机构
[1] CSIC, Ctr Nacl Biotecnol, Dept Genet Mol Plantas, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Biotecnol & Biomed, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Ctr Cabrils IRTA, Dept Entomol, Barcelona 08348, Spain
关键词
Heliothis; insect compensation; insect resistance; Liriomyza; PI-II; potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor (PCI);
D O I
10.1007/s11103-004-6959-9
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protease inhibitors have been proposed as potential defense molecules for increased insect resistance in crop plants. Compensatory over-production of insensitive proteases in the insect, however, has limited suitability of these proteins in plant protection, with very high levels of inhibitor required for increased plant resistance. In this study we have examined whether combined used of two inhibitors is effective to prevent this compensatory response. We show that leaf-specific over-expression of the potato PI-II and carboxypeptidase inhibitors (PCI) results in increased resistance to Heliothis obsoleta and Liriomyza trifolii larvae in homozygote tomato lines expressing high levels (>1% the total soluble proteins) of the transgenes. Leaf damage in hemizygous lines for these transformants was, however, more severe than in the controls, thus evidencing a compensation response of the larvae to the lower PI concentrations in these plants. Development of comparable adaptive responses in both insects suggests that insect adaptation does not entail specific recognition of the transgene, but rather represents a general adaptive mechanism triggered in response to the nutritional stress imposed by sub-lethal concentrations of the inhibitors. Combined expression of defense genes with different mechanisms of action rather than combinations of inhibitors may then offer a better strategy in pest management as it should be more effective in overcoming this general adaptive response in the insect.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 202
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]  
DOW JAT, 1992, J EXP BIOL, V172, P355
[22]   Transgenic rice plants harboring an introduced potato proteinase inhibitor II gene are insect resistant [J].
Duan, XL ;
Li, XG ;
Xue, QZ ;
AboElSaad, M ;
Xu, DP ;
Wu, R .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 14 (04) :494-498
[23]   EVIDENCE FOR AN INTRALUMINAL MEDIATOR IN RAT PANCREATIC-ENZYME SECRETION - RECONSTITUTION OF THE PANCREATIC RESPONSE WITH DIETARY-PROTEIN, TRYPSIN AND THE MONITOR PEPTIDE [J].
FUSHIKI, T ;
KAJIURA, H ;
FUKUOKA, S ;
KIDO, K ;
SEMBA, T ;
IWAI, K .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1989, 119 (04) :622-627
[24]  
Gatehouse A. M. R., 1992, BIOTECHNOLOGY AGR, P155
[25]   A strong inhibitor of chymotrypsin/elastase is highly antimetabolic to Helicoverpa armigera larvae [J].
Gatehouse, LN ;
Christeller, JT ;
Gatehouse, HS ;
Zou, XY .
NEW ZEALAND PLANT PROTECTION, VOL 55, 2002, 55 :421-428
[26]   Growth stimulation of beetle larvae reared on a transgenic oilseed rape expressing a cysteine proteinase inhibitor [J].
Girard, C ;
Le Métayer, M ;
Zaccomer, B ;
Bartlet, E ;
Williams, I ;
Bonadé-Bottino, M ;
Pham-Delegue, MH ;
Jouanin, L .
JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 44 (3-4) :263-270
[27]  
Hilder V.A., 1992, TRANSGENIC PLANTS, P310
[28]   A NOVEL MECHANISM OF INSECT RESISTANCE ENGINEERED INTO TOBACCO [J].
HILDER, VA ;
GATEHOUSE, AMR ;
SHEERMAN, SE ;
BARKER, RF ;
BOULTER, D .
NATURE, 1987, 330 (6144) :160-163
[29]   EXPRESSION OF PROTEINASE INHIBITOR-I AND INHIBITOR-II IN TRANSGENIC TOBACCO PLANTS - EFFECTS ON NATURAL DEFENSE AGAINST MANDUCA-SEXTA LARVAE [J].
JOHNSON, R ;
NARVAEZ, J ;
AN, GH ;
RYAN, C .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1989, 86 (24) :9871-9875
[30]   PROTEASE ACTIVITIES IN THE LARVAL MIDGUT OF HELIOTHIS-VIRESCENS - EVIDENCE FOR TRYPSIN AND CHYMOTRYPSIN-LIKE ENZYMES [J].
JOHNSTON, KA ;
LEE, MJ ;
BROUGH, G ;
HILDER, VA ;
GATEHOUSE, AMR ;
GATEHOUSE, JA .
INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 25 (03) :375-383