Tax compliance and enforcement in the pampas evidence from a field experiment

被引:119
作者
Castro, Lucio [1 ]
Scartascini, Carlos [2 ]
机构
[1] CIPPEC, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Inter Amer Dev Bank, Res Dept, Washington, DC 20577 USA
关键词
Tax compliance; Evasion; Tax morale; Property tax; Randomized field experiment; Behavioral economics; PROSPECT-THEORY; EVASION; MORALE; AUDIT; PAY; PROBABILITY; STRATEGIES; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Tax evasion is a pervasive problem in many countries. In particular, some developing countries do not collect even half of what they would if taxpayers complied with the written letter of the law. The academic literature has not been oblivious to the need to explain why people pay (or do not pay) taxes. However, the empirical literature has not yet reached consensus. This paper reports the results of a large field experiment that tried to affect compliance by influencing property tax taxpayers' beliefs regarding the levels of enforcement, reciprocity, and peer-effects of the talc system in a municipality in Argentina. Results indicate that those taxpayers that received the deterrence message have a higher probability (almost 5 percentage points) to comply than the taxpayers in the control group. No average effects are found for the other two treatments. However, this average effects masks important results. After receiving the reciprocity and the peer-effects messages, the probability of compliance increased for some taxpayers but it decreased for others according to their underlying distribution of beliefs. The evidence in this paper advances the state of knowledge, may help to reconcile some of the results in the literature, and provides the basis for advancing policies and research on tax compliance in developing countries. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 82
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]  
[Anonymous], 38 AUSTR NAT U CTR T
[22]  
[Anonymous], J EC SURV
[23]   DETERRENCE AND MORAL PERSUASION EFFECTS ON CORPORATE TAX COMPLIANCE: FINDINGS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
Ariel, Barak .
CRIMINOLOGY, 2012, 50 (01) :27-69
[24]   Do audits enhance compliance? An empirical assessment of VAT enforcement [J].
Bergman, Marcelo ;
Nevarez, Armando .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2006, 59 (04) :817-832
[25]   BEYOND REVEALED PREFERENCE: CHOICE-THEORETIC FOUNDATIONS FOR BEHAVIORAL WELFARE ECONOMICS [J].
Bernheim, B. Douglas ;
Rangel, Antonio .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2009, 124 (01) :51-104
[26]   Do normative appeals affect tax compliance? Evidence from a controlled experiment in Minnesota [J].
Blumenthal, M ;
Christian, C ;
Slemrod, J .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2001, 54 (01) :125-136
[27]   In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments [J].
Bruhn, Miriam ;
McKenzie, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2009, 1 (04) :200-232
[28]   Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Looney, Adam ;
Kroft, Kory .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (04) :1145-1177
[29]  
Corbacho A, 2013, MORE THAN REVENUE: TAXATION AS A DEVELOPMENT TOOL, P49
[30]   UNWILLINGNESS TO PAY - TAX EVASION AND PUBLIC GOOD PROVISION [J].
COWELL, FA ;
GORDON, JPF .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1988, 36 (03) :305-321