Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia

被引:56
作者
Liu, SS
Moore, JM
Luo, AM
Trautman, WJ
Carpenter, RL
机构
[1] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA 98111 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
electromyography; local anesthetics; opioids; postoperative pain;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199903000-00014
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Ropivacaine, 0.2%, is a new local anesthetic approved for epidural analgesia. The addition of 4 mu g/ml fentanyl improves analgesia from epidural ropivacaine, Use of a lower concentration of ropivacaine-fentanyl may further improve analgesia or decrease side effects. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were randomized in a double-blinded manner to receive one of three solutions: 0.2% ropivacaine-4 mu g fentanyl, 0.1% ropivacain-2 mu g fentanyl, or 0.05% ropivacaine-l pg fentanyl for patient-controlled epidural analgesia after standardized combined epidural and general anesthesia. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia settings and adjustments for the three solutions were standardized to deliver equivalent drug doses. Pain scores (rest, cough, and ambulation), side effects (nausea, pruritus, sedation, motor block, hypotensiofi, and orthostasis), and patient-controlled epidural analgesia consumption were measured for 48 h, Results:All three solutions produced equivalent analgesia. Motor block was significantly more common (30 vs. 0%) and more Intense with the 0.2% ropivacaine-4 mu g fentanyl solution, Other side effects were equivalent between solutions and mild in severity. A significantly smaller volume of 0.2% ropivacaine-4 mu g fentanyl solution was used, whereas the 0.1% ropivacaine-2 mu g fentanyl group used a significantly greater amount of ropivacaine and fentanyl. Conclusions: Lesser concentrations of ropivacaine and fentanyl provide comparable analgesia with less motor block despite the use of similar amounts of ropivacaine and fentanyl, This finding suggests that concentration of local anesthetic solution at loa. doses is a primary determinant of motor block with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lower abdominal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 733
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BIRNBACH DJ, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P808
[2]   SIDE-EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL AND EPIDURAL OPIOIDS [J].
CHANEY, MA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (10) :891-903
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF EPINEPHRINE ON LIDOCAINE SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - A CROSS-OVER STUDY [J].
CHIU, AA ;
LIU, S ;
CARPENTER, RL ;
KASMAN, GS ;
POLLOCK, JE ;
NEAL, JM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (04) :735-739
[4]   ALTERED NEURAL CONDUCTION WITH EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE [J].
CUSICK, JF ;
MYKLEBUST, JB ;
ABRAM, SE ;
DAVIDSON, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 57 (01) :31-36
[5]   Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery [J].
Etches, RC ;
Writer, WDR ;
Ansley, D ;
Nydahl, PA ;
Ong, BY ;
Lui, A ;
Badner, N ;
Kawolski, S ;
Muir, H ;
Shukla, R ;
Beattie, WS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04) :784-790
[6]  
LAVEAUX MMD, 1993, REGION ANESTH, V18, P39
[7]   ORAL CLONIDINE PROLONGS LIDOCAINE SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN HUMAN VOLUNTEERS [J].
LIU, S ;
CHIU, AA ;
NEAL, JM ;
CARPENTER, RL ;
BAINTON, BG ;
GERANCHER, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1353-1359
[8]   Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl on hospital wards - Prospective experience with 1,030 surgical patients [J].
Liu, SS ;
Allen, HW ;
Olsson, GL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (03) :688-695
[9]   LUMBAR EPIDUROGRAPHY AND EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
SJOGREN, P ;
GEFKE, K ;
BANNING, AM ;
PARSLOV, M ;
OLSEN, LBO .
PAIN, 1989, 36 (03) :305-309
[10]   EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE FOR AORTIC-SURGERY - THE EFFECT OF DILUTION ON THE QUALITY OF ANALGESIA [J].
SLADE, JM .
ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 49 (01) :21-24