Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract

被引:96
作者
Bultitude, MF [1 ]
Tiptaft, RC [1 ]
Glass, JM [1 ]
Dasgupta, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Urol, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00506-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To present our series of patients with ureteral stent encrustation and give indwelling times and management. Encrustation is one of the most serious complications of ureteral stents. Methods. A retrospective review was undertaken of all encrusted stents during a 4-year period. The inclusion criterion was a stent that required some form of intervention above the ureteral orifice to remove it. Combinations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and open surgery were used to achieve stent removal. Results. Forty-nine impacted encrusted stents were treated in 41 patients. Of these, 75.5% had become encrusted within 6 months and 42.8% within 4 months. The mean indwelling time was 5.6 months. Forty-seven stents were removed by endourologic techniques, with 4 requiring extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone, 28 ureteroscopy, and 10 a combination of both. Five patients underwent successful percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One patient underwent open surgery, and in one removal failed. The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.94. Conclusions. Stent encrustation can pose a serious challenge to the endourologist, and indwelling times should be minimized to avoid problems. Patients often require multiple treatments and a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy offers highly successful outcomes and often avoids the need for more invasive techniques. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 626
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Current management of severely encrusted ureteral stents with a large associated stone burden [J].
Borboroglu, PG ;
Kane, CJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (03) :648-650
[2]   A model to quantify encrustation on ureteric stents, urethral catheters and polymers intended for urological use [J].
Choong, SKS ;
Wood, S ;
Whitfield, HN .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (04) :414-421
[3]   BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF VARIOUS INDWELLING DOUBLE-J STENTS [J].
CORMIO, L ;
TALJA, M ;
KOIVUSALO, A ;
MAKISALO, H ;
WOLFF, H ;
RUUTU, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (02) :494-496
[4]   Biomaterials used in urology: Current issues of biocompatibility, infection, and encrustation [J].
Denstedt, JD ;
Wollin, TA ;
Reid, G .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :493-500
[5]   An in vitro comparison of urease-induced encrustation of JJ stents in human urine [J].
Desgrandchamps, F ;
Moulinier, F ;
Daudon, M ;
Teillac, P ;
LeDuc, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (01) :24-27
[6]   Clinical effectiveness of new stent design: Randomized single-blind comparison of tail and double-pigtail stents [J].
Dunn, MD ;
Portis, AJ ;
Kahn, SA ;
Yan, Y ;
Shalhav, AL ;
Elbahnasy, AM ;
Bercowsky, E ;
Hoenig, DM ;
Wolf, JS ;
McDougall, EM ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) :195-202
[7]   EXPERIENCE WITH NEW DOUBLE J-URETERAL CATHETER STENT [J].
FINNEY, RP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1978, 120 (06) :678-681
[8]   Tips and tricks for the management of retained ureteral stents [J].
Lam, JS ;
Gupta, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2002, 16 (10) :733-741
[9]   Endourological management of severely encrusted ureteral stents [J].
Mohan-Pillai, K ;
Keeley, FX ;
Moussa, SA ;
Smith, G ;
Tolley, DA .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (05) :377-379
[10]   THE FORGOTTEN INDWELLING URETERAL STENT - A UROLOGICAL DILEMMA [J].
MONGA, M ;
KLEIN, E ;
CASTANEDAZUNIGA, WR ;
THOMAS, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (06) :1817-1819