Multicriteria VMAT optimization

被引:91
作者
Craft, David [1 ,4 ]
McQuaid, Dualta [2 ,3 ]
Wala, Jeremiah [1 ,4 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ,4 ]
Salari, Ehsan [1 ,4 ]
Bortfeld, Thomas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, London SM2 5PT, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHSFT, London SM2 5PT, England
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
VMAT; optimization; convex; multi-criteria; pareto optimal; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; PLAN QUALITY; IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1118/1.3675601
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: To make the planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) faster and to explore the tradeoffs between planning objectives and delivery efficiency. Methods: A convex multicriteria dose optimization problem is solved for an angular grid of 180 equi-spaced beams. This allows the planner to navigate the ideal dose distribution Pareto surface and select a plan of desired target coverage versus organ at risk sparing. The selected plan is then made VMAT deliverable by a fluence map merging and sequencing algorithm, which combines neighboring fluence maps based on a similarity score and then delivers the merged maps together, simplifying delivery. Successive merges are made as long as the dose distribution quality is maintained. The complete algorithm is called VMERGE. Results: VMERGE is applied to three cases: a prostate, a pancreas, and a brain. In each case, the selected Pareto-optimal plan is matched almost exactly with the VMAT merging routine, resulting in a high quality plan delivered with a single arc in less than 5 min on average. Conclusions: VMERGE offers significant improvements over existing VMAT algorithms. The first is the multicriteria planning aspect, which greatly speeds up planning time and allows the user to select the plan, which represents the most desirable compromise between target coverage and organ at risk sparing. The second is the user-chosen epsilon-optimality guarantee of the final VMAT plan. Finally, the user can explore the tradeoff between delivery time and plan quality, which is a fundamental aspect of VMAT that cannot be easily investigated with current commercial planning systems. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3675601]
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 696
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2009, INT J RAD ONCOL BIOL
[2]
Bedford J., 2008, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V73, P537
[3]
Bokrantz R., 2011, TRITAMAT2011OS3
[4]
What is the optimum leaf width of a multileaf collimator? [J].
Bortfeld, T ;
Oelfke, U ;
Nill, S .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (11) :2494-2502
[5]
Development and evaluation of an efficient approach to volumetric arc therapy planning [J].
Bzdusek, Karl ;
Friberger, Henrik ;
Eriksson, Kjell ;
Hardemark, Bjorn ;
Robinson, David ;
Kaus, Michael .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) :2328-2339
[6]
PEACOCK(TM) - A SYSTEM FOR PLANNING AND ROTATIONAL DELIVERY OF INTENSITY-MODULATED FIELDS [J].
CAROL, MP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) :56-61
[7]
A fast optimization algorithm for multicriteria intensity modulated proton therapy planning [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Craft, David ;
Madden, Thomas M. ;
Zhang, Kewu ;
Kooy, Hanne M. ;
Herman, Gabor T. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (09) :4938-4945
[8]
Exploration of tradeoffs in intensity-modulated radiotherapy [J].
Craft, D ;
Halabi, T ;
Bortfeld, T .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (24) :5857-5868
[9]
The tradeoff between treatment plan quality and required number of monitor units in intensity-modulated radiotherapy [J].
Craft, David ;
Suess, Philipp ;
Bortfeld, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (05) :1596-1605
[10]
Approximating convex Pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning [J].
Craft, David L. ;
Halabi, Tarek F. ;
Shih, Helen A. ;
Bortfeld, Thomas R. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (09) :3399-3407