Contingency management in substance abuse treatment: A structured review of the evidence for its transportability

被引:53
作者
Hartzler, Bryan [1 ]
Lash, Steve J. [2 ,3 ]
Roll, John M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Alcohol & Drug Abuse Inst, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Salem, VA 24153 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychiat & Neurobehav Med, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Program Excellence Addict, Spokane, WA 99210 USA
关键词
Contingency management; Implementation science; Transportability; METHADONE-MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; BEHAVIORAL THERAPIES RESEARCH; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MOTIVATIONAL INCENTIVES; INNOVATION ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; COCAINE ABSTINENCE; USE DISORDERS; TAKE-HOME; DRUG-USE;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.11.011
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: Extant literature on contingency management (CM) transportability, or its transition from academia to community practice, is reviewed. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR: Damschroder et al., 2009) guides the examination of this material. Methods: Psychlnfo and Medline database searches identified 27 publications, with reviewed reference lists garnering 22 others. These 49 sources were examined according to CFIR domains of the intervention. outer setting, inner setting, clinicians, and implementation processes. Results: Intervention characteristics were focal in 59% of the identified literature, with less frequent focus on clinicians (34%), inner setting (32%), implementation processes (18%), and outer setting (8%). As intervention characteristics, adaptability and trialability most facilitate transportability whereas non-clinical origin, perceived inefficacy or disadvantages, and costs are impediments. Clinicians with a managerial focus and greater clinic tenure and CM experience are candidates to curry organizational readiness for implementation, and combat staff disinterest or philosophical objection. A clinic's technology comfort, staff continuity, and leadership advocacy are inner setting characteristics that prompt effective implementation. Implementation processes in successful demonstration projects include careful fiscal/logistical planning, role-specific staff engagement, practical adaptation in execution, and evaluation via fidelity-monitoring and cost-effectiveness analyses. Outer setting characteristics-like economic policies and inter-agency networking or competition-are salient, often unrecognized influences. Conclusions: As most implementation constructs are still moving targets, CM transportability is in its infancy and warrants further scientific attention. More effective dissemination may necessitate that future research weight emphasis on external validity, and utilize models of implementation science. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Addiction Technology Transfer Center Network (ATTC), 2004, CHANG BOOK BLUEPR TE
[2]   Low-cost contingency management in community clinics: Delivering incentives partially in group therapy [J].
Alessi, Sheila M. ;
Hanson, Tressa ;
Wieners, Mary ;
Petry, Nancy M. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 15 (03) :293-300
[3]   A tale of two cities: Financing two voucher programs for substance abusers through community donations [J].
Amass, L ;
Kamien, J .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 12 (02) :147-155
[4]  
Amass L., 2008, CONTINGENCY MANAGEME, P280
[5]   Technology transfer through performance management: the effects of graphical feedback and positive reinforcement on drug treatment counselors' behavior [J].
Andrzejewski, ME ;
Kirby, KC ;
Morral, AR ;
Iguchi, MY .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2001, 63 (02) :179-186
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis
[8]  
[Anonymous], MOTIVATING BEHAV CHA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the 21st Century
[10]   Testing combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions in alcohol dependence: Rationale and methods [J].
Anton, R ;
Randall, C ;
Latham, P ;
Ciraulo, D ;
LoCastro, J ;
Donovan, D ;
Kivlahan, D ;
Saxon, A ;
Johnson, B ;
Roache, J ;
Mason, B ;
Salvato, F ;
Williams, L ;
Mattson, M ;
Miller, W ;
Westerberg, V ;
Tonigan, JS ;
O'Malley, S ;
Petrakis, I ;
Krystal, J ;
Pettinati, H ;
Flannery, B ;
Swift, R ;
Longabaugh, R ;
Weiss, R ;
Gastfriend, D ;
Greenfield, S ;
Zweben, A ;
Cisler, R ;
Fleming, M ;
Hosking, J ;
Garbutt, J ;
Couper, D .
ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 27 (07) :1107-1122