Prediction of outcome of fetal congenital heart disease using a cardiovascular profile score

被引:115
作者
Wieczorek, A. [1 ]
Hernandez-Robles, J. [1 ]
Ewing, L. [2 ]
Leshko, J. [2 ]
Luther, S. [3 ]
Huhta, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Pediat, Coll Med, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USA
[2] All Childrens Hosp, St Petersburg, FL USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
cardiomegaly; cardiovascular profile score; congenital heart disease; congestive heart failure; Doppler echocardiography; fetal echocardiography; hydrops fetalis;
D O I
10.1002/uog.5177
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives Congestive heart failure in fetuses with congenital heart defects (CHD) is associated with high perinatal mortality. The clinical condition can be characterized by five ultrasound markers that comprise the 10-point cardiovascular profile (CVP) score. Our aim was to assess the value of the CVP score in evaluating the condition and in maintaining surveillance of fetuses with CHD. Methods We evaluated retrospectively 131 singleton pregnancies with a diagnosis of fetal CHD, which had been assessed by serial echocardiographic examinations, during which the CVP score was obtained. Fetal and neonatal outcomes, including perinatal mortality and Apgar scores, were assessed. Results Fetuses with a final CVP score <= 7 were statistically significantly more likely to suffer mortality than were fetuses with a final CVP score >= 8 (87.5% vs. 15.2% mortality; P < 0.0001, chi square = 24.5). Significance was maintained after controlling for birth weight, lag time between the final examination and delivery and the dichotomized 5-min Apgar score (odds ratio, 22.3; P = 0.024). For low Apgar score and mortality, the CVP score had low sensitivity (0.25 and 0.27, respectively) but high specificity (0.98 and 0.99, respectively). The presence of hydrops and severe cardiomegaly were statistically significantly associated with mortality (P < 0.05). Conclusions Fetuses with CHD and a CVP score below 8 are at risk of perinatal death. The CVP score may be used to assess the severity of fetal CHD and to plan perinatal management. Copyright (C) 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 288
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]  
KISERUD T, 1993, J MATERN-FETAL INVES, V3, P15
[12]   ULTRASONOGRAPHIC VELOCIMETRY OF THE FETAL DUCTUS VENOSUS [J].
KISERUD, T ;
EIKNES, SH ;
BLAAS, HGK ;
HELLEVIK, LR .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8780) :1412-1414
[13]  
Lemeshow S., 2000, WILEY PS TX, V2nd ed., P1, DOI 10.1002/0471722146
[14]   FETAL ASSESSMENT BASED ON FETAL BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE SCORING .4. AN ANALYSIS OF PERINATAL MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY [J].
MANNING, FA ;
HARMAN, CR ;
MORRISON, I ;
MENTICOGLOU, SM ;
LANGE, IR ;
JOHNSON, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (03) :703-709
[15]   Arterial Doppler ultrasound in 115 second- and third-trimester fetuses with congenital heart disease [J].
Meise, C ;
Germer, U ;
Gembruch, U .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 17 (05) :398-402
[16]   PRENATAL MEASUREMENT OF CARDIOTHORACIC RATIO IN EVALUATION OF HEART-DISEASE [J].
PALADINI, D ;
CHITA, SK ;
ALLAN, LD .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 1990, 65 (01) :20-23
[17]   Echocardiography in intrauterine growth restriction [J].
Rasanen, J ;
Debbs, RH ;
Huhta, JC .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04) :796-803
[18]   2D-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF THE FETAL HEART SIZE IN THE 2ND AND 3RD TRIMESTER OF UNCOMPLICATED PREGNANCY [J].
RESPONDEK, M ;
RESPONDEK, A ;
HUHTA, JC ;
WILCZYNSKI, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1992, 44 (03) :185-188
[19]   THE PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF FETAL TRICUSPID-VALVE REGURGITATION WITH NORMAL HEART ANATOMY [J].
RESPONDEK, ML ;
KAMMERMEIER, M ;
LUDOMIRSKY, A ;
WEIL, SR ;
HUHTA, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (05) :1265-1270
[20]   DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF FETAL CARDIAC-FUNCTION [J].
RIZZO, G ;
ARDUINI, D ;
ROMANINI, C .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 2 (06) :434-445