Evaluation of combined cardiac positron emission tomography and coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease

被引:5
作者
Adams, George L. [2 ,3 ]
Trimble, Mark A. [2 ,3 ]
Brosnan, Rhoda B. [2 ]
Russo, Cheryl A. [2 ]
Rusband, Dan [2 ]
Honeycutt, Emily F. [3 ]
Shaw, Linda K. [3 ]
Hurwitz, Lynn M. [1 ]
Turkington, Timothy G. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Hanson, Michael W. [1 ]
Pagnanelli, Robert A. [1 ]
Borges-Neto, Salvador [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Grad Program Med Phys, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
coronary angiography; coronary artery disease; coronary computed tomography angiography; positron emission tomography;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f8143b
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Multiple imaging modalities are used to screen for significant coronary artery disease. We report the concordance between coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and stress cardiac positron emission tomography (CPET) to detect significant coronary artery disease, the feasibility of combining CTA and CPET in one diagnostic test, and the ability of CTA and CPET to detect significant coronary artery disease by comparison with cardiac catheterization. Methods Forty patients were prospectively enrolled and imaged with a hybrid PET/CT scanner. Eighteen patients had cardiac catheterization data for comparison. Concordance of findings between diagnostic tests was assessed by examining overall percentage in agreement, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results The overall agreement between CTA and CPET for detecting significant coronary artery disease was 76.3% with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.7 and 69.2%, respectively. The overall agreement between CTA and cardiac catheterization for detecting significant coronary artery disease was 81.3% with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8 and 80.0%, respectively. The overall agreement between CPET and cardiac catheterization for detecting significant coronary artery disease was 77.8% with a sensitivity and specificity of 76.9 and 80.0%, respectively. Conclusion CTA and CPET can be performed in a single diagnostic test interval to simultaneously assess the extent of coronary artery disease and its hemodynamic significance. The sensitivity and specificity of CTA and CPET are similar to existing noninvasive screening tests.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 598
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Berman DS, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P74
[2]   ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: Summary article [J].
Cheitlin, MD ;
Armstrong, WF ;
Aurigemma, GP ;
Beller, GA ;
Bierman, FZ ;
Davis, JL ;
Douglas, PS ;
Faxon, DP ;
Gillam, LD ;
Kimball, TR ;
Kussmaul, WG ;
Pearlman, AS ;
Philbrick, JT ;
Rakowski, H ;
Thys, DM ;
Antman, EM ;
Smith, SC ;
Alpert, JS ;
Gregoratos, G ;
Anderson, JL ;
Hiratzka, LF ;
Faxon, DP ;
Hunt, SA ;
Fuster, V ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Russell, RO .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (05) :954-970
[3]   Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography [J].
Chow, BJW ;
Ananthasubramaniam, K ;
deKemp, RA ;
Dalipaj, MM ;
Beanlands, RSB ;
Ruddy, TD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (08) :1227-1234
[4]   Integrated cardiac PET-CT for the diagnosis and management of CAD [J].
Di Carli, MF ;
Dorbala, S ;
Hachamovitch, R .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) :139-144
[5]  
Fricke E, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P736
[6]   ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: Summary article - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines) [J].
Gibbons, RJ ;
Balady, GJ ;
Bricker, JT ;
Chaitman, BR ;
Fletcher, GF ;
Froelicher, VF ;
Mark, DB ;
McCallister, BD ;
Mooss, AN ;
O'Reilly, MG ;
Winters, WL ;
Antman, EM ;
Alpert, JS ;
Faxon, DP ;
Fuster, V ;
Gregoratos, G ;
Hiratzka, LF ;
Jacobs, AK ;
Russell, RO ;
Smith, SC .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (14) :1883-1892
[7]  
GO RT, 1990, J NUCL MED, V31, P1899
[8]  
GRAVES EJ, 1992, DETAILED DIAGNOSES P, V13
[9]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[10]   SPECT and PET in the evaluation of coronary artery disease [J].
Jadvar, H ;
Strauss, HW ;
Segall, GM .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 (04) :915-926