Health status versus quality of life in older patients: Does the distinction matter?

被引:108
作者
Covinsky, KE [1 ]
Wu, AW
Landefeld, CS
Connors, AF
Phillips, RS
Tsevat, J
Dawson, NV
Lynn, J
Fortinsky, RH
机构
[1] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[7] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[8] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Cleveland MetroHealth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[10] George Washington Univ, Ctr Improve Care Dying, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[11] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Aging, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00052-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Although health-related quality of life in older people is generally assessed by measuring specific domains of health status, such as activities of daily living or pain, the association between health-status measures and patients' perceptions of their quality of life is not clear. Indeed, it is controversial whether these health-status measures should be considered measures of quality of life at all. Our objective was to determine the association between health-status measures and older patients' perceptions of their global quality of life. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 493 cognitively intact patients 80 years of age and older, interviewed 2 months after a hospitalization. We measured patients' self-assessed global quality of life and four domains of health status: physical capacity, limitations in performing activities of daily living, psychological distress, and pain. RESULTS: Each of the four scales was significantly correlated with patients' global perceptions of their quality of life (P <0.001). The ability of the health-status scales to discriminate between patients with differing global quality of life was generally good, especially for the physical capacity (c statistic = 0.72) and psychological distress scales (c statistic = 0.70). However, for a substantial minority of patients, scores on the health-status scales did not accurately reflect their global quality of life. For example, global quality of life was described as fair or poor by 15% of patients with the highest (best tertile) physical capacity scores, 25% of patients who were independent in all activities of daily living, 21% of patients with the least psychological distress (best tertile), and by 30% with no pain symptoms. Similarly, global quality of life was described as good or better by 43% of patients with the worst physical capacity (worst tertile), 49% of patients who were dependent in at least two activities of daily living, 47% of patients with the most psychological distress (worst tertile), and 51% of patients with severe pain. CONCLUSION: On average, health status is a reasonable indicator of global quality of life for groups of older patients with recent illness. However, disagreement between patients' reported health status and their perceptions of their global quality of life was common. Therefore, assumptions about the overall quality of life of individual patients should not be based on measures of their health status alone. (C) 1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 440
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [11] A BRIEF SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONNAIRE TO DETERMINE FUNCTIONAL-CAPACITY (THE DUKE ACTIVITY STATUS INDEX)
    HLATKY, MA
    BOINEAU, RE
    HIGGINBOTHAM, MB
    LEE, KL
    MARK, DB
    CALIFF, RM
    COBB, FR
    PRYOR, DB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 64 (10) : 651 - 654
  • [12] Hunt SM, 1997, QUAL LIFE RES, V6, P205
  • [13] When walking fails
    Iezzoni, LI
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (19): : 1609 - 1613
  • [14] Kahana E., 1982, AGING ENV THEORETICA, P97, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50008-9_158
  • [15] MEASURE OF PRIMARY SOCIOBIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS
    KATZ, S
    AKPOM, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 1976, 6 (03): : 493 - 508
  • [16] A CONTROLLED TRIAL TO IMPROVE CARE FOR SERIOUSLY ILL HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - THE STUDY TO UNDERSTAND PROGNOSES AND PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES AND RISKS OF TREATMENTS (SUPPORT)
    KNAUS, WA
    CONNORS, AF
    DAWSON, NV
    DESBIENS, NA
    FULKERSON, WJ
    GOLDMAN, L
    LYNN, J
    OYE, RK
    BERGNER, M
    DAMIANO, A
    HAKIM, R
    MURPHY, DJ
    TENO, J
    VIRNIG, B
    WAGNER, DP
    WU, AW
    YASUI, Y
    ROBINSON, DK
    KRELING, B
    DULAC, J
    BAKER, R
    HOLAYEL, S
    MEEKS, T
    MUSTAFA, M
    VEGARRA, J
    ALZOLA, C
    HARRELL, FE
    COOK, EF
    HAMEL, MB
    PETERSON, L
    PHILLIPS, RS
    TSEVAT, J
    FORROW, L
    LESKY, L
    DAVIS, R
    KRESSIN, N
    SOLZAN, J
    PUOPOLO, AL
    BARRETT, LQ
    BUCKO, N
    BROWN, D
    BURNS, M
    FOSKETT, C
    HOZID, A
    KEOHANE, C
    MARTINEZ, C
    MCWEENEY, D
    MELIA, D
    OTTO, S
    SHEEHAN, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (20): : 1591 - 1598
  • [17] APACHE-II - A SEVERITY OF DISEASE CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM
    KNAUS, WA
    DRAPER, EA
    WAGNER, DP
    ZIMMERMAN, JE
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1985, 13 (10) : 818 - 829
  • [18] The problem of quality of life in medicine
    Leplege, A
    Hunt, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (01): : 47 - 50
  • [19] McNair DM, 1971, EITS MANUAL PROFILE
  • [20] MURPHY DJ, 1990, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL S, V43, P1