Traditional breast cancer risk factors in relation to molecular subtypes of breast cancer

被引:178
作者
Tamimi, Rulla M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Colditz, Graham A. [4 ]
Hazra, Aditi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baer, Heather J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hankinson, Susan E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rosner, Bernard [1 ,2 ]
Marotti, Jonathan [2 ,5 ]
Connolly, James L. [2 ,5 ]
Schnitt, Stuart J. [2 ,5 ]
Collins, Laura C. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Channing Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer; Risk factors; Molecular subtype; ER; PR; HER2; GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS; ESTROGEN; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CARCINOMAS;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-011-1702-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
At least four major categories of invasive breast cancer have been reproducibly identified by gene expression profiling: luminal A, luminal B, HER2-type, and basal-like. These subtypes have been shown to differ in their outcome and response to treatment. Whether this heterogeneity reflects the evolution of these subtypes through distinct etiologic pathways has not been clearly defined. We evaluated the association between traditional breast cancer risk factors and risk of previously defined molecular subtypes of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study. This analysis included 2,022 invasive breast cancer cases for whom we were able to obtain archived breast cancer tissue specimens. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed, and slides were immunostained for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Using immunostain results in combination with histologic grade, cases were grouped into molecularly defined subtypes. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We observed differences in the association between risk factors and subtypes of breast cancer. In general, many reproductive factors were most strongly associated with the luminal A subtype, although these differences were not statistically significant. Weight gain since age 18 showed significant differences in its association with molecular subtypes (P-heterogeneity = 0.05) and was most strongly associated with the luminal B subtype (P-trend 0.001). Although there was not significant heterogeneity for lactation across subtypes, an inverse association was strongest for basal-like tumors (HR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8; P-heterogeneity = 0.88). These results support the hypothesis that different subtypes of breast cancer have different etiologies and should not be considered as a single group. Identifying risk factors for less common subtypes such as luminal B, HER2-type and basal-like tumors has important implications for prevention of these more aggressive subtypes.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 167
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses [J].
Abd El-Rehim, DM ;
Ball, G ;
Pinder, SE ;
Rakha, E ;
Paish, C ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Macmillan, D ;
Blamey, RW ;
Ellis, IO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) :340-350
[2]
Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: Ready for clinical application? [J].
Brenton, JD ;
Carey, LA ;
Ahmed, AA ;
Caldas, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (29) :7350-7360
[3]
Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer [J].
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Voduc, David ;
Gao, Dongxia ;
Leung, Samuel ;
Snider, Jacqueline ;
Watson, Mark ;
Davies, Sherri ;
Bernard, Philip S. ;
Parker, Joel S. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Ellis, Matthew J. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (10) :736-750
[4]
Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status [J].
Colditz, GA ;
Rosner, BA ;
Chen, WY ;
Holmes, MD ;
Hankinson, SE .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (03) :218-228
[5]
The Nurses' Health Study: Lifestyle and health among women [J].
Colditz, GA ;
Hankinson, SE .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2005, 5 (05) :388-396
[6]
Comparison of estrogen receptor results from pathology reports with results from central laboratory testing [J].
Collins, Laura C. ;
Marotti, Jonathan D. ;
Baer, Heather J. ;
Tamimi, Rulla M. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (03) :218-221
[7]
Bimodal frequency distribution of estrogen receptor immunohistochemical staining results in breast cancer [J].
Collins, LC ;
Botero, ML ;
Schnitt, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 123 (01) :16-20
[8]
Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma [J].
El-Rehim, DMA ;
Pinder, SE ;
Paish, CE ;
Bell, J ;
Blamey, R ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Nicholson, RI ;
Ellis, IO .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2004, 203 (02) :661-671
[9]
Gaudet MM, 2011, BREAST CANC RES TREA
[10]
Comparison of risk factors for the competing risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, and venous thromboembolism [J].
Glynn, RJ ;
Rosner, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 162 (10) :975-982