Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer

被引:1620
作者
Cheang, Maggie C. U. [8 ,9 ]
Chia, Stephen K. [7 ]
Voduc, David [6 ,8 ,9 ]
Gao, Dongxia [8 ,9 ]
Leung, Samuel [8 ,9 ]
Snider, Jacqueline [5 ]
Watson, Mark [5 ]
Davies, Sherri [5 ]
Bernard, Philip S. [4 ]
Parker, Joel S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perou, Charles M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ellis, Matthew J. [5 ]
Nielsen, Torsten O. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Genet, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Oncol,Siteman Canc Ctr, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[6] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Radiat Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[7] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Med Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[8] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[9] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Genet Pathol Evaluat Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2009年 / 101卷 / 10期
关键词
GENE-EXPRESSION PATTERNS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; PROLIFERATION MARKERS; MOLECULAR PORTRAITS; ADJUVANT THERAPY; KI-67; EXPRESSION; SURVIVAL; MICROARRAY; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djp082
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Gene expression profiling of breast cancer has identified two biologically distinct estrogen receptor (ER)-positive subtypes of breast cancer: luminal A and luminal B. Luminal B tumors have higher proliferation and poorer prognosis than luminal A tumors. In this study, we developed a clinically practical immunohistochemistry assay to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors and investigated its ability to separate tumors according to breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival. Tumors from a cohort of 357 patients with invasive breast carcinomas were subtyped by gene expression profile. Hormone receptor status, HER2 status, and the Ki67 index (percentage of Ki67-positive cancer nuclei) were determined immunohistochemically. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the Ki67 cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors. The prognostic value of the immunohistochemical assignment for breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival was investigated with an independent tissue microarray series of 4046 breast cancers by use of Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression. Gene expression profiling classified 101 (28%) of the 357 tumors as luminal A and 69 (19%) as luminal B. The best Ki67 index cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors was 13.25%. In an independent cohort of 4046 patients with breast cancer, 2847 had hormone receptor-positive tumors. When HER2 immunohistochemistry and the Ki67 index were used to subtype these 2847 tumors, we classified 1530 (59%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 57% to 61%) as luminal A, 846 (33%, 95% CI = 31% to 34%) as luminal B, and 222 (9%, 95% CI = 7% to 10%) as luminal-HER2 positive. Luminal B and luminal-HER2-positive breast cancers were statistically significantly associated with poor breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival in all adjuvant systemic treatment categories. Of particular relevance are women who received tamoxifen as their sole adjuvant systemic therapy, among whom the 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 79% (95% CI = 76% to 83%) for luminal A, 64% (95% CI = 59% to 70%) for luminal B, and 57% (95% CI = 47% to 69%) for luminal-HER2 subtypes. Expression of ER, progesterone receptor, and HER2 proteins and the Ki67 index appear to distinguish luminal A from luminal B breast cancer subtypes.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 750
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, INTRO BOOTSTRAP
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1984, Analysis of Survival Data
  • [3] Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer
    Berry, DA
    Cronin, KA
    Plevritis, SK
    Fryback, DG
    Clarke, L
    Zelen, M
    Mandelblatt, JS
    Yakovlev, AY
    Habbema, JDF
    Feuer, EJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) : 1784 - 1792
  • [4] Berry RS, 2006, SCI AM, V295, P14
  • [5] Lack of prognostic significance of the monoclonal antibody Ki-S1, a novel marker of proliferative activity, in node-negative breast carcinoma
    Bevilacqua, P
    Verderio, P
    Barbareschi, M
    Bonoldi, E
    Boracchi, P
    Palma, PD
    Gasparini, G
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 37 (02) : 123 - 133
  • [6] Statistics notes - Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method)
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7172) : 1572 - 1572
  • [7] The logrank test
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7447): : 1073 - 1073
  • [8] Amplification of EMSY, a novel oncogene on 11q13, in high grade ovarian surface epithelial carcinomas
    Brown, LA
    Irving, J
    Parker, R
    Kim, H
    Press, JZ
    Longacre, TA
    Chia, S
    Magliocco, A
    Makretsov, N
    Gilks, B
    Pollack, J
    Huntsman, D
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (02) : 264 - 270
  • [9] Validation of tissue microarray technology in breast carcinoma
    Camp, RL
    Charette, LA
    Rimm, DL
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2000, 80 (12) : 1943 - 1949
  • [10] Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Livasy, Chad A.
    Dressler, Lynn G.
    Cowan, David
    Conway, Kathleen
    Karaca, Gamze
    Troester, Melissa A.
    Tse, Chiu Kit
    Edmiston, Sharon
    Deming, Sandra L.
    Geradts, Joseph
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    Moorman, Patricia G.
    Earp, H. Shelton
    Millikan, Robert C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21): : 2492 - 2502