Soil organic carbon changes in the cultivation of energy crops: Implications for GHG balances and soil quality for use in LCA

被引:159
作者
Brandao, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Mila i Canals, Llorenc [2 ,3 ]
Clift, Roland [2 ]
机构
[1] Commiss European Communities, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm Strategy, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[3] Unilever, SEAC, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Energy crops; Oilseed rape; Miscanthus; Willow short-rotation coppice (SRC); Forest residues; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Land use; Soil quality; Carbon sequestration; Soil organic carbon (SOC); LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; SMALL-SCALE PRODUCTION; COMPARING LARGE-SCALE; LAND-USE; GREENHOUSE-GAS; BIOMASS ENERGY; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY; BIOENERGY SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.019
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The environmental impact of different land-use systems for energy, up to the farm or forest "gate", has been quantified with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Four representative crops are considered: OilSeed Rape (OSR), Miscanthus, Short-Rotation Coppice (SRC) willow and forest residues. The focus of the LCA is on changes in Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) but energy use, emissions of GreenHouse Gases (GHGs), acidification and eutrophication are also considered. In addition to providing an indicator of soil quality, changes in SOC are shown to have a dominant effect on total GHG emissions. Miscanthus is the best land-use option for GHG emissions and soil quality as it sequesters C at a higher rate than the other crops, but this has to be weighed against other environmental impacts where Miscanthus performs worse, such as acidification and eutrophication. OSR shows the worst performance across all categories. Because forest residues are treated as a by-product, their environmental impacts are small in all categories. The analysis highlights the need for detailed site-specific modelling of SOC changes, and for consequential LCAs of the whole fuel cycle including transport and use. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2323 / 2336
页数:14
相关论文
共 110 条
[91]   BIOMASS ENERGY FROM CROP AND FOREST RESIDUES [J].
PIMENTEL, D ;
MORAN, MA ;
FAST, S ;
WEBER, G ;
BUKANTIS, R ;
BALLIETT, L ;
BOVENG, P ;
CLEVELAND, C ;
HINDMAN, S ;
YOUNG, M .
SCIENCE, 1981, 212 (4499) :1110-1115
[92]   Biofuels and other approaches for decreasing fossil fuel emissions from agriculture [J].
Powlson, DS ;
Riche, AB ;
Shield, I .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2005, 146 (02) :193-201
[93]   Identifying the yield potential of Miscanthus x giganteus:: an assessment of the spatial and temporal variability of M-x giganteus biomass productivity across England and Wales [J].
Price, L ;
Bullard, M ;
Lyons, H ;
Anthony, S ;
Nixon, P .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2004, 26 (01) :3-13
[94]   Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production from poplar energy crops compared with conventional fossil fuels [J].
Rafaschieri, A ;
Rapaccini, M ;
Manfrida, G .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 40 (14) :1477-1493
[95]   Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire? [J].
Raghu, S. ;
Anderson, R. C. ;
Daehler, C. C. ;
Davis, A. S. ;
Wiedenmann, R. N. ;
Simberloff, D. ;
Mack, R. N. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5794) :1742-1742
[96]   Environment - Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? [J].
Righelato, Renton ;
Spracklen, Dominick V. .
SCIENCE, 2007, 317 (5840) :902-902
[97]  
ROBERT TW, 2000, SUMMARY POLICYMAKERS
[98]   Energy crops: current status and future prospects [J].
Sims, Ralph E. H. ;
Hastings, Astley ;
Schlamadinger, Bernhard ;
Taylor, Gail ;
Smith, Pete .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2006, 12 (11) :2054-2076
[99]   A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 [J].
Smeets, Edward M. W. ;
Faaij, Andre P. C. ;
Lewandowski, Iris M. ;
Turkenburg, Wim C. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2007, 33 (01) :56-106
[100]   Carbon sequestration in croplands: the potential in Europe and the global context [J].
Smith, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2004, 20 (03) :229-236