Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:53
作者
Augustin, H
Eggert, T
Wenske, S
Karakiewicz, PI
Palisaar, J
Daghofer, F
Huland, H
Graefen, M
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, LKH Graz, Dept Urol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Hamburg, Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; predictive value of tests;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000099827.77355.a7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We validated externally the predictive accuracy of the 2001 Partin tables and compared the 1997 and 2001 versions. Materials and Methods: We used ROC derived AUC to test the predictive accuracy of organ confinement (OC), extraprostatic extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) and lymph node involvement (LNI) of 1997 and 2001 Partin tables derived probabilities. These probabilities were defined by the pretreatment clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen and biopsy Gleason grade of 2,139 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Results: OC, ECE, SVI and LNI were noted in 63.5%, 23.1%, 10.5% and 2.9% of cases, respectively. AUC of the 2001 tables was 0.787, 0.766, 0.775 and 0.790, for OC, ECE, SVI and LNI, respectively. These values were virtually the same as the respective 1997 Partin table AUC values, namely 0.784, 0.728, 0.791 and 0.799. Conclusions: This external validation of the 2001 Partin tables confirms good predictive accuracy of the updated tables. However, predictive accuracy in this external validation data set of 2,139 European men is virtually the same as that of the original 1997 tables. Therefore, a transition from the 1997 tables to the updated 2001 version does not appear warranted unless superior accuracy is demonstrated in other external cohorts.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 181
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UROLOGIC PATHOLOGY
[2]  
BEAHRS OH, 1992, MANUAL STAGING CANC, P181
[3]   Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Partin, AW ;
Walsh, PC ;
Kattan, MW ;
Scardino, PT ;
Montie, JE ;
Pearson, JD ;
Slezak, JM ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1591-1595
[4]   Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy [J].
Chan, TY ;
Partin, AW ;
Walsh, PC ;
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) :823-827
[5]   Prospective validation of an algorithm with systematic sextant biopsy to predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma [J].
Conrad, S ;
Graefen, M ;
Pichlmeier, U ;
Henke, RP ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Huland, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) :521-525
[6]   Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: Accuracy and clinical implications [J].
Cookson, MS ;
Fleshner, NE ;
Soloway, SM ;
Fair, WR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) :559-562
[7]   Can predictive models for prostate cancer patients derived in the United States of America be utilized in European patients? A validation study of the Partin tables [J].
Graefen, M ;
Augustin, H ;
Karakiewicz, PI ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Haese, A ;
Palisaar, J ;
Blonski, J ;
Fernandez, S ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Huland, H .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (01) :6-10
[8]   Era specific biochemical recurrence-free survival following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Piantadosi, S ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :416-419
[9]   Primary gleason pattern as a predictor of disease progression in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer - A multivariate analysis of 823 men treated with radical prostatectomy [J].
Herman, CM ;
Kattan, MW ;
Ohori, M ;
Scardino, PT ;
Wheeler, TM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 25 (05) :657-660
[10]  
Kattan MW, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V79, P528, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970201)79:3<528::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO