Determinants of dentists' decisions to initiate dental implant treatment: A judgment analysis

被引:7
作者
Koele, P
Hoogstraten, J
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80017-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Statement of problem. Do psychosocial patient characteristics influence the decision of a dentist in recommending implant treatment Purpose. This study assessed the importance that dental general practitioners attach to psychosocial patient characteristics when judging the suitability of these patients for dental implant treatment. Method and material. The judgment strategy of 30 Dutch dental practitioners was studied by using 2 tasks. Dentists first judged a series of written scenarios representing fictitious patients, each patient being characterized by 4 psychosocial aspects to determine the patients' suitability for implant treatment. The sec ond task involved rank ordering 14 patient characteristics according to their importance in implant treatment decisions. Results. Dentists judged the personal appearance of the patient and, to a lesser degree, the patient's socioeconomic status to influence decisions to treat. However, these characteristics are ranked as quite unimportant in decision making, whereas motivation, oral hygiene, and level of neuroticism were the most important patient characteristics. Conclusions. The results on the 2 tasks were. clearly not in agreement. There was a substantial disagreement between what dentists say to be important characteristics (rank order task) and the characteristics they actually use to judge the suitability for implant treatment (scenario task). Moreover, it appeared that agreement among the dentists is quite low, especially for the scenario task.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 480
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Brehmer A, 1988, Advances in psychology, V54, P75, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62171-8
[2]
[3]
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.1016/C2013-0-10517-X
[4]
CUNE M, 1993, THESIS UTRECHT STATE
[5]
A nationwide evaluative study on implant-retained overdentures [J].
Cune, MS ;
dePutter, C ;
Hoogstraten, J .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 :S13-S19
[6]
TREATMENT OUTCOME WITH IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURES .1. CLINICAL FINDINGS AND PREDICTABILITY OF CLINICAL TREATMENT OUTCOME [J].
CUNE, MS ;
DEPUTTER, C ;
HOOGSTRATEN, J .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 72 (02) :144-151
[7]
CHARACTERISTICS OF 5410 EDENTULOUS IMPLANT CANDIDATES AND THE TREATMENT THEY RECEIVE [J].
CUNE, MS ;
DEPUTTER, C ;
HOOGSTRATEN, J .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 23 (02) :110-113
[8]
DENDEKKER J, 1990, THESIS U AMSTERDAM A
[9]
Fleiss J. L., 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P322
[10]
GROEN HJ, 1997, DENT CONSULTANTS DIL