CHARACTERISTICS OF 5410 EDENTULOUS IMPLANT CANDIDATES AND THE TREATMENT THEY RECEIVE

被引：18

作者：

CUNE, MS ^{[1
]}

DEPUTTER, C ^{[1
]}

HOOGSTRATEN, J ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ACAD CTR DENT AMSTERDAM,DEPT SOCIAL DENT & DENT HLTH EDUC,1066 EA AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS

来源：

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 1995年 / 23卷 / 02期

关键词：

CHARACTERISTICS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; OVERDENTURES;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1600-0528.1995.tb00211.x

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

Since 1989 implant dentistry in the Netherlands is a National Dental Insurance (NDI) benefit, thus reducing out-of-pocket expenditures for implant candidates considerably. A nationwide investigation was set up in order to evaluate quantitative, qualitative and financial effects of this new provision. The patient and treatment characteristics of 5410 edentulous implant candidates are discussed. Intensive monitoring of the usage of these new regulations facilitates health care policy making, including future planning. Over a 3 1/2 yr period, two out of every thousand totally edentulous NDI patients were treated in combination with dental implants. This number is being considered small, bearing in mind the number of edentulous patients in the Netherlands and the proportion of dissatisfied denture wearers. Demographic data, prosthetic and pre-prosthetic surgical history reveal that these patients, mostly female and middle-aged, experience severe denture-related problems. In the majority of cases the implants are placed by an oral surgeon and the suprastructure is made by a general dentist or at a centre for special dental care. The treatment itself mostly consists of an implant retained overdenture on two or four permucosal implants and a bar-construction.

引用

页码：110 / 113

页数：4

共 42 条

[1]

Waas van MAJ, (1985)

[2]

Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler R, Branemark P-I., A 15‐year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw, Int J Oral Surg, 11, pp. 387-416, (1981)

[3]

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR., The long‐term efficacy of currently used denial implants: a review and proposed criteria for success, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp. 11-15, (1986)

[4]

Zarb G, Symington J., Osseointegrated dental implants. Preliminary report on a replication study, J Prosthet Dent, 50, pp. 271-276, (1983)

[5]

Bosker H, Jordan RD, Sindet-Pedersen S, Koole R., The transmandibular implant: a 13 year survey of its use, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp. 482-492, (1991)

[6]

Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U., A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures int, J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, pp. 129-134, (1988)

[7]

Babbush CA, Kent JN, Misiek DJ., Titanium plasma‐sprayed (TPS) screw implants for the reconstruction of the edentulous mandible, J Oral Maxillofac Surq, 44, pp. 274-282, (1986)

[8]

Jemt T, Book K, Linden B, Urde G., Failures and complications in 92 consecutively placed overdentures by Branemark implants in severely resorbed maxillae: a study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check‐up, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp. 162-167, (1992)

[9]

Johns RB, Jemt T, Heath MR, Et al., A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp. 513-522, (1992)

[10]

Palmqvist S, Sodervelut B., Arnbjerg D., Subjective need for implant dentistry in a Swedish population aged 45–69 years, Clin Oral Impl Res, 2, pp. 99-102, (1991)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →