CHARACTERISTICS OF 5410 EDENTULOUS IMPLANT CANDIDATES AND THE TREATMENT THEY RECEIVE

被引：18

作者：

CUNE, MS ^{[1
]}

DEPUTTER, C ^{[1
]}

HOOGSTRATEN, J ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ACAD CTR DENT AMSTERDAM,DEPT SOCIAL DENT & DENT HLTH EDUC,1066 EA AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS

来源：

COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 1995年 / 23卷 / 02期

关键词：

CHARACTERISTICS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; OVERDENTURES;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1600-0528.1995.tb00211.x

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

Since 1989 implant dentistry in the Netherlands is a National Dental Insurance (NDI) benefit, thus reducing out-of-pocket expenditures for implant candidates considerably. A nationwide investigation was set up in order to evaluate quantitative, qualitative and financial effects of this new provision. The patient and treatment characteristics of 5410 edentulous implant candidates are discussed. Intensive monitoring of the usage of these new regulations facilitates health care policy making, including future planning. Over a 3 1/2 yr period, two out of every thousand totally edentulous NDI patients were treated in combination with dental implants. This number is being considered small, bearing in mind the number of edentulous patients in the Netherlands and the proportion of dissatisfied denture wearers. Demographic data, prosthetic and pre-prosthetic surgical history reveal that these patients, mostly female and middle-aged, experience severe denture-related problems. In the majority of cases the implants are placed by an oral surgeon and the suprastructure is made by a general dentist or at a centre for special dental care. The treatment itself mostly consists of an implant retained overdenture on two or four permucosal implants and a bar-construction.

引用

页码：110 / 113

页数：4

共 42 条

[11]

Statistisch jaarboek 1992's, (1992)

[12]

Bergman B., Evaluation of the results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, J Prosthet Dent, 50, pp. 114-115, (1983)

[13]

Hahn W., Long term results with intraosseous implants: a questionnaire‐based assessment, Int Dent J, 33, pp. 383-389, (1983)

[14]

Council on Dental Materials. Instruments, and Equipment. Summary of the results of the endosseous implant registry, J Am Dem Assoc, 114, pp. 672-673, (1987)

[15]

Mau J, Lukas D, Mau G., Verweildauera‐nalyse anhand der Erhebung des Arbeitskreises Implantologie innerhulb der DGZMK, Z Zahnartzl Implantol, 3, pp. 18-21, (1987)

[16]

Mau J, Thomas J, Lukas D, Tetsch P., Eine erste Verlustanalyse aus dem Implantatregister, Z Zahnarztl Implantol, 4, pp. 188-195, (1988)

[17]

Dental implant registry history and findings, Int J Oral Implant, 8, pp. 81-93, (1991)

[18]

Weyant RJ, Burt BA., Survival rates of endosseous cylinder implants, J Dent Res, 77, (1992)

[19]

(1988)

[20]

Cawood JI, Howell RA., A classification of the edentulous jaws, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 17, pp. 232-236, (1988)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →