The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and priorities

被引：96

作者：

Houghton, J. R. ^{[1
]}

Rowe, G. ^{[1
]}

Frewer, L. J. ^{[2
]}

Van Kleef, E. ^{[2
]}

Chryssochoidis, G. ^{[3
]}

Kehagia, O. ^{[3
]}

Korzen-Bohr, S. ^{[4
]}

Lassen, J. ^{[4
]}

Pfenning, U. ^{[5
]}

Strada, A. ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Inst Food Res, Norwich NR4 7UA, Norfolk, England

[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Dept Social Sci, Marketing & Consumer Behav Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands

[3] Agr Univ Athens, Lab Agribusiness Management, GR-11855 Athens, Greece

[4] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

[5] Dialog gGmbH, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany

[6] Jagiellonian Univ, AF Modrzewski Krakow Coll, Krakow, Poland

来源：

FOOD POLICY | 2008年 / 33卷 / 01期

关键词：

risk analysis; risk assessment; risk communication; risk management; risk perception; Europe; food; media; trust;

D O I：

10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.05.001

中图分类号：

F3 [农业经济];

学科分类号：

0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;

摘要：

In this paper, we address the issue of food risk management as practised in Western Europe. We begin by considering how food risks are managed, and then go on to consider how well they are managed. There are multiple answers to the 'how well' question, which are related to the varied perspectives of the different key stakeholders - from the food risk managers and producers, to the general public and the media. Consequently, there is no clear answer to the question of quality. What our review does identify is two priorities relevant to our understanding of effective food risk management: first, a need for further research to determine the source and nature of the different evaluative perspectives, and second, a need for the key stakeholders to appreciate and understand the alternative perspectives in order to enhance the effectiveness of the food risk management process. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：13 / 26

页数：14

共 127 条

[21] Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies [J].