Developing and Testing a Theoretical Framework for Computer-Mediated Transparency of Local Governments

被引:220
作者
Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan G. [1 ]
Welch, Eric W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Sch Governance, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Publ Adm, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Sci Technol & Environm Policy Lab, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
POLITICAL COMPETITION; ISSUE OWNERSHIP; WEB SITE; ACCOUNTABILITY; INFORMATION; RESPONSIVENESS; PRESSURE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02532.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
This article contributes to the emerging literature on transparency by developing and empirically testing a theoretical framework that explains the determinants of local government Web site transparency. It aims to answer the following central question: What institutional factors determine the different dimensions of government transparency? The framework distinguishes three dimensions of transparencydecision making transparency, policy information transparency, and policy outcome transparencyand hypothesizes three explanations for each: organizational capacity, political influence, and group influence on government. Results indicate that each dimension of transparency is associated with different factors. Decision-making transparency is associated with political influence; when left-wing parties are strong in the local council, local government tends to be more transparent. Policy information transparency is associated with media attention and external group pressure, and policy outcome transparency is associated with both external group pressure and the organizational capacity. The authors discuss the implications for policy and administration.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 571
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   Dynamics of public sector accountability in an era of reform [J].
Romzek, BS .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 66 (01) :21-44
[42]   ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE PUBLIC-SECTOR - LESSONS FROM THE CHALLENGER TRAGEDY [J].
ROMZEK, BS ;
DUBNICK, MJ .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1987, 47 (03) :227-238
[43]   Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation [J].
Rowe, G ;
Frewer, LJ .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2000, 25 (01) :3-29
[44]   POLICY RESPONSIVENESS TO PROTEST-GROUP DEMANDS [J].
SCHUMAKER, PD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1975, 37 (02) :488-521
[45]  
Shapiro AndrewL., 1999, The Control Revolution: How the Internet Is Putting Individuals in Charge and \Changing the World We Know
[46]   Would You Ask Turkeys to Mandate Thanksgiving? The Dismal Politics of Legislative Transparency [J].
Snider, J. H. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2009, 6 (02) :127-155
[47]  
Stone D., 2012, Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making, V3rd ed.
[48]   The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government [J].
Tolbert, Caroline J. ;
Mossberger, Karen .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (03) :354-369
[49]   Issue ownership and party choice [J].
van der Brug, W .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2004, 23 (02) :209-233
[50]   Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government [J].
Welch, EW ;
Hinnant, CC ;
Moon, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2005, 15 (03) :371-391