Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial

被引:198
作者
Cleland, JA
Childs, MJD
McRae, M
Palmer, JA
Stowell, T
机构
[1] Franklin Pierce Coll, Phys Therapy Program, Concord, NH 03301 USA
[2] Concord Hosp, Rehabil Serv, Concord, NH USA
[3] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Dept Phys Therapy, San Antonio, TX 78236 USA
[4] Monadnock Commun Hosp, Peterborough, NH USA
关键词
cervical pain; thoracic spine manipulation; manual therapy; mechanical neck pain;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2004.08.005
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Mechanical neck pain is a common occurrence in the general population resulting in a considerable economic burden. Often physical therapists will incorporate manual therapies directed at the cervical spine including joint mobilization and manipulation into the management of patients with cervical pain. Although the effectiveness of mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine has been well documented, the small inherent risks associated with these techniques has led clinicians to frequently utilize manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in this patient population. It is hypothesized that thoracic spine manipulation may elicit similar therapeutic benefits as cervical spine manipulation while minimizing the magnitude of risk associated with the cervical technique. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate the immediate effects of thoracic spine manipulation on perceived pain levels in patients presenting with neck pain. The results suggest that thoracic spine manipulation results in immediate analgesic effects in patients with mechanical neck pain. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of thoracic spine manipulation in patients with neck pain on long-term outcomes including function and disability. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[31]   Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain -: A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Hoving, JL ;
Koes, BW ;
de Vet, HCW ;
van der Windt, DAWM ;
Assendelft, WJJ ;
van Mameren, H ;
Devillé, WLJM ;
Pool, JJM ;
Scholten, RJPM ;
Bouter, LM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (10) :713-722
[32]   A survey to examine attitudes and patterns of practice of physiotherapists who perform cervical spine manipulation [J].
Hurley, L ;
Yardley, K ;
Gross, AR ;
Hendry, L ;
McLaughlin, L .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2002, 7 (01) :10-18
[33]   Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine - A systematic review of the literature [J].
Hurwitz, EL ;
Aker, PD ;
Adams, AH ;
Meeker, WC ;
Shekelle, PG .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1746-1759
[34]  
ISAAC ER, 2002, BOURDILLONS SPINAL M, P185
[35]   PHYSICAL THERAPY EPISODES OF CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
JETTE, AM ;
SMITH, K ;
HALEY, SM ;
DAVIS, KD .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (02) :101-110
[36]   A randomized controlled trial of exercise and manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache [J].
Jull, G ;
Trott, P ;
Potter, H ;
Zito, G ;
Niere, K ;
Shirley, D ;
Emberson, J ;
Marschner, I ;
Richardson, C .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (17) :1835-1843
[37]   Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? [J].
Kelly, AM .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (11) :1086-1090
[38]   The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain [J].
Kelly, AM .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (03) :205-207
[39]   INITIAL-IMPRESSION DIAGNOSIS USING LOW-BACK-PAIN PATIENT PAIN DRAWINGS [J].
MANN, NH ;
BROWN, MD ;
HERTZ, DB ;
ENGER, I ;
TOMPKINS, J .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (01) :41-53
[40]   Causes of complications from cervical spine manipulation [J].
Mann, T ;
Refshauge, KM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2001, 47 (04) :255-266