Differentiation between multiple liver hemangiomas and liver metastases of gastrinomas: Value of enhanced MRI

被引:23
作者
Berger, JF
Laissy, JP
Limot, O
HenryFeugeas, MC
Cadiot, G
Mignon, M
SchoumanClaeys, E
机构
[1] HOP BICHAT,DEPT RADIOL,F-75877 PARIS 18,FRANCE
[2] HOP BICHAT,DEPT GASTROENTEROL,F-75877 PARIS 18,FRANCE
关键词
liver; neoplasms; gastrinoma; computed tomography;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199605000-00003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumors are known to mimic hemangiomas on nonenhanced SE MR sequences. The usefulness of MR examination with gadolinium injection to identify lesions was prospectively evaluated. Method: Nine patients with multiple liver metastases of gastrinomas were compared with six patients showing multiple liver hemangiomas. Patients underwent unenhanced T2-weighted SE, T1-weighted SE, and FLASH sequences, followed by enhanced sequential FLASH sequences and a 5 min delayed T1-weighted SE sequence. Results: On T2-weighted SE sequence, all hemangiomas displayed the same typical morphology as a sharply defined, homogeneous, high signal intensity lesion, but this pattern was also observed for some or all of the lesions in seven of nine patients with gastrinoma metastases. Dynamic FLASH sequences were accurate for lesions larger than 2 cm, hemangiomas displaying a nodular peripheral enhancement with centripetal filling in, and metastases displaying either an initial homogeneous or a regular peripheral enhancement. Precise assessment of lesions smaller than 2 cm remained equivocal. Delayed T1-weighted SE sequence (performed at least 5 min after Gd-chelate injection) was the most accurate technique to identify metastases by showing hypo- or isointensity signal, whereas all hemangiomas were hyperintense. Conclusion: Postcontrast delayed T1-weighted sequence is the primary technique to differentiate equivocal cases of hemangiomas from metastases of gastrinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 355
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] DEFINITIVE DIAGNOSIS OF HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS - MR IMAGING VERSUS TC-99M-LABELED RED-BLOOD-CELL SPECT
    BIRNBAUM, BA
    WEINREB, JC
    MEGIBOW, AJ
    SANGER, JJ
    LUBAT, E
    KANAMULLER, H
    NOZ, ME
    BOSNIAK, MA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [2] GIANT CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA OF THE LIVER - CT AND MR IMAGING IN 10 CASES
    CHOI, BI
    HAN, MC
    PARK, JH
    KIM, SH
    HAN, MH
    KIM, CW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 152 (06) : 1221 - 1226
  • [3] PATHOMORPHOLOGIC, BIOCHEMICAL, AND DIAGNOSTIC ASPECTS OF GASTRINOMAS (ZOLLINGER-ELLISON SYNDROME)
    CREUTZFELDT, W
    ARNOLD, R
    CREUTZFELDT, C
    TRACK, NS
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1975, 6 (01) : 47 - 76
  • [4] HEPATIC-TUMORS - QUANTITATIVE TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION WITH MR IMAGING
    EGGLIN, TK
    RUMMENY, E
    STARK, DD
    WITTENBERG, J
    SAINI, S
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) : 107 - 110
  • [5] FECHNER RE, 1977, HUM PATHOL, V8, P225
  • [6] LIVER-TUMOR IMAGING - CURRENT CONCEPTS
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) : 473 - 484
  • [7] HEPATIC CAVERNOUS HEMANGIOMA - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING - WORK IN PROGRESS
    GLAZER, GM
    AISEN, AM
    FRANCIS, IR
    GYVES, JW
    LANDE, I
    ADLER, DD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 155 (02) : 417 - 420
  • [8] FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS - CHARACTERIZATION WITH NONENHANCED AND DYNAMIC CONTRAST MATERIAL-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING
    HAMM, B
    THOENI, RF
    GOULD, RG
    BERNARDINO, ME
    LUNING, M
    SAINI, S
    MAHFOUZ, AE
    TAUPITZ, M
    WOLF, KJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 417 - 423
  • [9] DIFFERENTIATION OF HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS FROM METASTASES BY DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR IMAGING
    HAMM, B
    FISCHER, E
    TAUPITZ, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (02) : 205 - 216
  • [10] DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN SMALL HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS AND METASTASES ON MR IMAGES - IMPORTANCE OF SIZE-SPECIFIC QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA
    ITOH, K
    SAINI, S
    HAHN, PF
    IMAM, N
    FERRUCCI, JT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (01) : 61 - 66