Misunderstanding in cancer patients: Why shoot the messenger?

被引:141
作者
Gattellari, M
Butow, PN
Tattersall, MHN
Dunn, SM
MacLeod, CA
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Med, Med Psychol Unit, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Dept Canc Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
doctor-patient relations; informed consent; patient denial; patient understanding;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008336415362
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: We aimed to document the prevalence of misunderstanding in cancer patients and investigate whether patient denial is related to misunderstanding. Patients and methods. Two hundred forty-four adult cancer outpatients receiving treatment completed a survey assessing levels of understanding and denial. Doctors provided the facts against which patient responses were compared. Multiple logistic regression analyses determined the predictors of mis understanding. Results: Most patients understood the extent of their disease (71%, 95% CI: 65%-77%) and goal of treatment (60%, 95% CI: 54%-67%). Few correctly estimated the likelihood of treatment achieving cure (18%, 95% CI: 13%-23%), prolongation of life (13%, 95% CI: 8%-17%) and palliation (18%, 95% CI: 10%-27%). Patient denial predicted misunderstanding of the probability that treatment would cure disease when controlling for other patient and disease variables (OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 0.99-4.88, P = 0.05). Patient ratings of the clarity of information received were also predictive of patient understanding. Conclusions. Patient denial appears to produce misunderstanding, however, doctors' ability to communicate effectively is also implicated. The challenge that oncologists face is how to communicate information in a manner which is both responsive to patients' emotional status and sufficiently informative to allow informed decision-making to take place.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] *AUSTR GOV DEP EMP, 1987, AUSTR STAND CLASS OC
  • [2] 3 WAYS OF GIVING BAD-NEWS
    BREWIN, TB
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 337 (8751) : 1207 - 1209
  • [3] BREWIN TB, 1985, LANCET, V2, P490
  • [4] COMPUTER-BASED INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF THE CANCER CONSULTATION
    BUTOW, PN
    DUNN, SM
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    JONES, QJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 71 (05) : 1115 - 1121
  • [5] The dynamics of change: Cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support
    Butow, PN
    Maclean, M
    Dunn, SM
    Tattersall, MHN
    Boyer, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (09) : 857 - 863
  • [6] PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN THE CANCER CONSULTATION - EVALUATION OF A QUESTION PROMPT SHEET
    BUTOW, PN
    DUNN, SM
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    JONES, QJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) : 199 - 204
  • [7] LETTERS TO PATIENTS - IMPROVING COMMUNICATION IN CANCER CARE
    DAMIAN, D
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 338 (8772) : 923 - 925
  • [8] DO PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS PREDICT SURVIVAL IN BREAST-CANCER
    DEAN, C
    SURTEES, PG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1989, 33 (05) : 561 - 569
  • [9] GENERAL INFORMATION TAPES INHIBIT RECALL OF THE CANCER CONSULTATION
    DUNN, SM
    BUTOW, PN
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    JONES, QJ
    SHELDON, JS
    TAYLOR, JJ
    SUMICH, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (11) : 2279 - 2285
  • [10] EIDINGER RN, 1984, CANCER, V53, P2736, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840615)53:12<2736::AID-CNCR2820531233>3.0.CO