Effects of intensive blood pressure reduction on myocardial infarction and stroke in diabetes: a meta-analysis in 73 913 patients

被引:246
作者
Reboldi, Gianpaolo [2 ]
Gentile, Giorgio [2 ]
Angeli, Fabio
Ambrosio, Giuseppe [3 ]
Mancia, Giuseppe [4 ]
Verdecchia, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Assisi, Dept Med, I-06081 Assisi, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dept Internal Med, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
[3] Univ Perugia, Dept Cardiol, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med, Milan, Italy
关键词
cardiovascular risk; diabetes; hypertension; meta-analysis; myocardial infarction; stroke; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; CONVERTING-ENZYME-INHIBITORS; CARDIOVASCULAR MORBIDITY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION; ARTERY-DISEASE; RENAL OUTCOMES; RISK-FACTORS; MELLITUS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283469976
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective Guidelines generally recommend intensive lowering of blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2 diabetes. There is uncertainty about the impact of this strategy on case-specific events. Thus, we generated estimates of the effects of BP reduction on the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke in diabetic patients. Methods We selected studies which compared different BP-lowering agents and different BP intervention strategies in patients with diabetes. Outcome measures were MI and stroke. We abstracted information about study design, intervention, population, outcomes, and methodological quality for a total of 73 913 patients with diabetes (295 652 patient-years of exposure) randomized in 31 intervention trials. Results Overall, experimental treatment reduced the risk of stroke by 9% (P=0.0059), and that of MI by 11% (P=0.0015). Allocation to more-tight, compared with less-tight, BP control reduced the risk of stroke by 31% [relative risk (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.79], whereas the reduction in the risk of MI approached, but did not achieve, significance [odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.02]. In a meta-regression analysis, the risk of stroke decreased by 13% (95% CI 5-20, P=0.002) for each 5-mmHg reduction in SBP, and by 11.5% (95% CI 5-17, P<0.001) for each 2-mmHg reduction in DBP. In contrast, the risk of MI did not show any association with the extent of BP reduction (SBP: P=0.793; DBP: P=0.832). Conclusion In patients with diabetes, protection from stroke increases with the magnitude of BP reduction. We were unable to detect such a relation for MI. J Hypertens 29: 1253-1269 (c) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Journal of Hypertension 2011, 29: 1253-1269
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1269
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
American Diabetes Association, 2010, DIABETES CARE, V33, pS11, DOI DOI 10.2337/dc10-S011
[2]   Prognostic importance of weight loss in chronic heart failure and the effect of treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: an observational study [J].
Anker, SD ;
Negassa, A ;
Coats, AJS ;
Afzal, R ;
Poole-Wilson, PA ;
Cohn, JN ;
Yusuf, S .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9363) :1077-1083
[3]  
[Anonymous], LANCET
[4]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN EPIDEMIOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WILEY SERIES PROBABI
[6]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN BASIC CARD S1
[7]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[8]   IMPACT OF THE TREATMENT OF ISOLATED SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION ON BEHAVIORAL VARIABLES - RESULTS FROM THE SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION IN THE ELDERLY PROGRAM [J].
APPLEGATE, WB ;
PRESSEL, S ;
WITTES, J ;
LUHR, J ;
SHEKELLE, RB ;
CAMEL, GH ;
GREENLICK, MR ;
HADLEY, E ;
MOYE, L ;
PERRY, HM ;
SCHRON, E ;
WEGENER, V .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 154 (19) :2154-2160
[9]   Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) study [J].
Assmann, G ;
Cullen, P ;
Schulte, H .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (03) :310-315
[10]   Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bakris, GL ;
Fonseca, V ;
Katholi, RE ;
McGill, JB ;
Messerli, FH ;
Phillips, RA ;
Raskin, P ;
Wright, JT ;
Oakes, R ;
Lukas, MA ;
Anderson, KM ;
Bell, DSH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (18) :2227-2236