共 42 条
Comparison between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and death: a meta-analysis
被引:115
作者:
Reboldi, Gianpaolo
[3
]
Angeli, Fabio
[1
]
Cavallini, Claudio
[1
]
Gentile, Giorgio
[3
]
Mancia, Giuseppe
[2
]
Verdecchia, Paolo
[1
]
机构:
[1] Hosp Santa Maria Misericordia, Dept Cardiol, Clin Res Unit Prevent Cardiol, I-06156 Perugia, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Perugia, Dept Internal Med, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
关键词:
hypertension;
meta-analysis;
mortality;
myocardial infarction;
prevention;
prognosis;
stroke;
therapy;
D O I:
10.1097/HJH.0b013e328306ebe2
中图分类号:
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100210 ;
摘要:
Objectives To compare the effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality and total mortality. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized comparative trials between angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Inclusion criteria were publication in peer-reviewed journals indexed in Medline, randomized comparison of angiotensin II receptor blockers vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin II receptor blockers + angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, report of major complications including myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality or all-cause mortality; average follow-up of at least 1 year in at least 200 patients. Results Six trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, for a total of 49 924 patients. In the pooled estimate, there were no significant differences between angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the risk of myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.07; P = 0.75), cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.08; P = 0.23) and total mortality (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.10; P=0.20). This was the case also when the analysis involved only the comparison between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. Overall, the risk of stroke was slightly lower with angiotensin II receptor blockers than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.99; P=0.037), the direct angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers comparison showing a nonsignificant trend in a similar direction. Statistical heterogeneity among trials was not significant, with a low to null inconsistency statistic, for stroke (P=0.67), myocardial infarction (P=0.86), cardiovascular mortality (P=0.14) and total mortality (P=0.12). Conclusion This overview suggests that angiotensin II receptor blockers are as effective as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the risk of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality and total mortality. Angiotensin II receptor blockers may be slightly more protective than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the risk of stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:1282 / 1289
页数:8
相关论文