Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making - The effects of communication media

被引:143
作者
Hollingshead, AB
机构
[1] University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL
[2] University of Illinois, Department of Speech Communication, 244 Lincoln Hall, Urbana, IL 61801
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This experiment investigated the conditions under which a member with information critical for making the best group decision will positively influence the group's final choice. The impact of two factors on group decision quality, information exchange, and perceptions of influence was examined: (a) status differences among members (equal-status vs. mixed-status groups) and (b) communication media (face-to-face vs. computer-mediated communication). Three-person groups were composed such that the critical information required to make the best decision was given only to the low-status member in the mixed-status groups and randomly assigned to one member in the equal-status groups. The results indicated that the mixed-status groups made poorer decisions and made fewer references to critical information than equal-status groups, regardless of the communication medium. Computer-mediated communication suppressed information exchange and the perceived influence of group members, suggesting that the relation between status and communication media is more complex than proposed in past research.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 219
页数:27
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   DISCOVERY OF HIDDEN PROFILES BY DECISION-MAKING GROUPS - SOLVING A PROBLEM VERSUS MAKING A JUDGMENT [J].
STASSER, G ;
STEWART, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (03) :426-434
[32]   EXPERT ROLES AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE DURING DISCUSSION - THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING WHO KNOWS WHAT [J].
STASSER, G ;
STEWART, DD ;
WITTENBAUM, GM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 31 (03) :244-265
[33]   EFFECTS OF INFORMATION LOAD AND PERCENTAGE OF SHARED INFORMATION ON THE DISSEMINATION OF UNSHARED INFORMATION DURING GROUP DISCUSSION [J].
STASSER, G ;
TITUS, W .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 53 (01) :81-93
[34]   INFORMATION SAMPLING IN STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED DISCUSSIONS OF 3-PERSON AND 6-PERSON GROUPS [J].
STASSER, G ;
TAYLOR, LA ;
HANNA, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (01) :67-78
[35]   DOES THE MEDIUM MATTER - THE INTERACTION OF TASK TYPE AND TECHNOLOGY ON GROUP-PERFORMANCE AND MEMBER REACTIONS [J].
STRAUS, SG ;
MCGRATH, JE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (01) :87-97
[36]   RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION IN COMPUTER-MEDIATED INTERACTION [J].
WALTHER, JB ;
BURGOON, JK .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1992, 19 (01) :50-88
[37]  
WEISBAND SP, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P1124, DOI 10.5465/256623
[38]   A STUDY OF INFLUENCE IN COMPUTER-MEDIATED GROUP DECISION-MAKING [J].
ZIGURS, I ;
POOLE, MS ;
DESANCTIS, GL .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1988, 12 (04) :625-644