Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance:: Triggering, signalling and expression

被引:144
作者
Pieterse, CMJ [1 ]
Van Pelt, JA [1 ]
Van Wees, SCM [1 ]
Ton, J [1 ]
Léon-Kloosterziel, KM [1 ]
Keurentjes, JJB [1 ]
Verhagen, BWM [1 ]
Knoester, M [1 ]
Van der Sluis, I [1 ]
Bakker, PAHM [1 ]
Van Loon, LC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Biol, Grad Sch Expt Plant Sci, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Arabidopsis; biological control; defence signalling; ethylene; jasmonic acid; salicylic acid;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008747926678
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Selected strains of rhizosphere bacteria reduce disease by activating a resistance mechanism in the plant named rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR). Rhizobacteria-mediated ISR resembles pathogen-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in that both types of induced resistance render uninfected plant parts more resistant towards a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. Some rhizobacteria trigger the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent SAR pathway by producing SA at the root surface. In other cases, rhizobacteria trigger a different signalling pathway that does not require SA. The existence of a SA-independent ISR pathway has been demonstrated in Arabidopsis thaliana. In contrast to pathogen-induced SAR, ISR induced by Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r is independent of SA accumulation and pathogenesis-related (PR) gene activation but, instead, requires responsiveness to the plant hormones jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene. Mutant analyses showed that ISR follows a novel signalling pathway in which components from the JA and ethylene response are successively engaged to trigger a defensive state that, like SAR, is controlled by the regulatory factor NPR1. Interestingly, simultaneous activation of both the JA/ethylene-dependent ISR pathway and the SA-dependent SAR pathway results in an enhanced level of protection. Thus combining both types of induced resistance provides an attractive tool for the improvement of disease control. This review focuses on the current status of our research on triggering, signalling, and expression of rhizobacteria-mediated ISR in Arabidopsis.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 61
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[41]   Salicylic acid-independent plant defence pathways [J].
Pieterse, CMJ ;
van Loon, LC .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 1999, 4 (02) :52-58
[42]   Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression [J].
Pieterse, CMJ ;
vanWees, SCM ;
Hoffland, E ;
vanPelt, JA ;
vanLoon, LC .
PLANT CELL, 1996, 8 (08) :1225-1237
[43]   A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis [J].
Pieterse, CMJ ;
van Wees, SCM ;
van Pelt, JA ;
Knoester, M ;
Laan, R ;
Gerrits, N ;
Weisbeek, PJ ;
van Loon, LC .
PLANT CELL, 1998, 10 (09) :1571-1580
[44]   Salicylic acid produced by Serratia marcescens 90-166 is not the primary determinant of induced systemic resistance in cucumber or tobacco [J].
Press, CM ;
Wilson, M ;
Tuzun, S ;
Kloepper, JW .
MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 1997, 10 (06) :761-768
[45]   Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene expression [J].
Reymond, P ;
Farmer, EE .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 1998, 1 (05) :404-411
[46]   SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED RESISTANCE INDUCED BY LOCALIZED VIRUS INFECTIONS IN PLANTS [J].
ROSS, AF .
VIROLOGY, 1961, 14 (03) :340-&
[47]   Systemic acquired resistance [J].
Ryals, JA ;
Neuenschwander, UH ;
Willits, MG ;
Molina, A ;
Steiner, HY ;
Hunt, MD .
PLANT CELL, 1996, 8 (10) :1809-1819
[48]   Systemic acquired resistance [J].
Sticher, L ;
MauchMani, B ;
Metraux, JP .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1997, 35 :235-270
[49]   ONE ROTTEN APPLE SPOILS THE WHOLE BUSHEL - THE ROLE OF ETHYLENE IN FRUIT RIPENING [J].
THEOLOGIS, A .
CELL, 1992, 70 (02) :181-184
[50]   Identification of a locus in Arabidopsis controlling both the expression of rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) and basal resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato [J].
Ton, J ;
Pieterse, CMJ ;
Van Loon, LC .
MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 1999, 12 (10) :911-918