Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil hydraulic properties

被引:479
作者
Schaap, MG [1 ]
Leij, FJ [1 ]
van Genuchten, MT [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, US Salin Lab, Riverside, CA 92507 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040001x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The solution of many field-scale Bow and transport problems requires estimates of unsaturated soil hydraulic properties. The objective of this study was to calibrate neural network models for prediction of water retention parameters and saturated hydraulic conductivity, K-s, from basic soil properties. Twelve neural network models were developed to predict water retention parameters using a data set of 1209 samples containing sand, silt, and clay contents, bulk density, porosity, gravel content, and soil horizon as well as water retention data. A subset of 620 samples was used to develop 19 neural network models to predict K-s. Prediction of water retention parameters and K-s generally improved if more input data were used, In a more detailed investigation, four models with the following levels of input data were selected: (i) soil textural class, (ii) sand, silt, and clay contents, (iii) sand, silt, and clay contents and bulk density, and (iv) the previous variables and water content at a pressure head of 33 kPa, For water retention, the root mean square residuals decreased from 0.107 for the first to 0.060 m(3) m(-3) for the fourth model while the root mean square residual K-s decreased from 0.627 to 0.451 log(cm d(-1)). The neural network models performed better on our data set than four published pedotransfer functions for water retention (by approximate to 0.01-0.05 m(3) m(-3)) and better than six published functions for K-s (by approximate to 0.1-0.9 order of magnitude). Use of the developed hierarchical neural network models is attractive because of improved accuracy and because it permits a considerable degree of flexibility toward available input data.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 855
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Artificial neural networks to estimate soil water retention from easily measurable data [J].
Pachepsky, YA ;
Timlin, D ;
Varallyay, G .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1996, 60 (03) :727-733
[22]  
Rawls W. J., 1985, Watershed management in the eighties., P293
[23]  
Rawls W.J., 1992, P INT WORKSHOP INDIR, P329
[24]  
RAWLS WJ, 1982, T ASAE, V25, P1316
[25]   ESTIMATING GENERALIZED SOIL-WATER CHARACTERISTICS FROM TEXTURE [J].
SAXTON, KE ;
RAWLS, WJ ;
ROMBERGER, JS ;
PAPENDICK, RI .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1986, 50 (04) :1031-1036
[26]   Modeling water retention curves of sanely soils using neural networks [J].
Schaap, MG ;
Bouten, W .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (10) :3033-3040
[27]  
*SOIL SURV STAFF, 1995, 45 NAT SOIL SURV CTR
[28]   Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity [J].
Tamari, S ;
Wosten, JHM ;
RuizSuarez, JC .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1996, 60 (06) :1732-1741
[29]   EVALUATION OF PEDO-TRANSFER FUNCTIONS [J].
TIETJE, O ;
TAPKENHINRICHS, M .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1993, 57 (04) :1088-1095