Sample sizes for clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints and competing risks

被引:39
作者
Schulgen, G
Olschewski, M
Krane, V
Wanner, C
Ruf, G
Schumacher, M
机构
[1] Inst Med Biometry & Med Informat, Dept Med Biometry & Stat, D-79104 Freiberg, Germany
[2] Univ Clin, Div Nephrol, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Pfizer Ltd, Clin Res Dept, Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
clinical trial; competing risks; sample size; time-to-event endpoint;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.010
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
We consider clinical trials where the time to occurrence of events in the presence of competing risks is the primary endpoint for treatment evaluation. The number of events with regard to the defined primary endpoint required to ensure the specified power can be calculated according to Schoenfeld's formula like in classical survival studies. However, determination of the number of patients that have to be recruited to observe the calculated number of events requires specification of the length of the accrual period, the trial duration and assumptions about the event-specific hazard functions. Information from previous studies about expected failure rates for the reference treatment is useful and can be translated into assumptions about the appropriate model parameters. A formula for sample size computation is presented for two competing outcome states. Nomograms help to communicate different alternatives of duration and size of the trial to interdisciplinary committees whose members plan and monitor the clinical trial. The 4D trial (Die Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie) designed to compare lipid lowering treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin with placebo in type 2 diabetic patients on hemodialysis with respect to time to the composite event "cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction" is used as an example to outline the statistical methods. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 396
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AALEN OO, 1978, SCAND J STAT, V5, P141
[2]  
Andersen P. K., 2012, Statistical models based on counting processes
[3]  
Andersen PK, 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES, V11, P91, DOI 10.1191/0962280202SM276ra
[4]   Competing risks as a multi-state model [J].
Andersen, PK ;
Abildstrom, SZ ;
Rosthoj, S .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (02) :203-215
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]   SAMPLE-SIZE - HOW MANY PATIENTS ARE NECESSARY [J].
FAYERS, PM ;
MACHIN, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 72 (01) :1-9
[7]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[8]   Interpretation of nonfatal events after cardiac surgery: Actual versus actuarial reporting [J].
Grunkemeier, GL ;
Wu, YX .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 122 (02) :216-219
[9]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[10]   Apolipoprotein A, fibrinogen, age, and history of stroke are predictors of death in dialysed diabetic patients: a prospective study in 412 subjects [J].
Koch, M ;
Kutkuhn, B ;
Grabensee, B ;
Ritz, E .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 12 (12) :2603-2611