How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?

被引:204
作者
Chen, CC
Lee, RC
Lin, JK
Wang, LW
Yang, SH
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Koo Fdn, Sun Yat Sen Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
rectal adenocarcinoma; preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-004-0851-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy is currently the main neoadjuvant therapy used to treat locally advanced middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma. A restaging work-up with magnetic resonance imaging was hoped to provide information about the effects related to combined chemoradiotherapy. The goal was to evaluate the correlation between pathologically verified tumor stages and clinical stages predicted by magnetic resonance imaging after combined chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Between August 2000 and June 2003, 50 patients with biopsy-proven middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma, with initial stage T3-T4 or N+, MO, were recruited in this series. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was used to stage the tumor before and after combined chemoradiotherapy. A protocol of the standard external radiation dose and oral combined uracil and 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin was used. The results of magnetic resonance imaging restaging after combined chemoradiotherapy were correlated with the pathologic staging. RESULTS: The overall predictive accuracy in T stage was 52 percent, whereas overstaging and understaging occurred in 38 percent and 10 percent of patients, respectively. Most of the inaccurate T staging was a result of the overstaging of superficial tumors (T0-T2). In N stage, accurate staging was noted in 68 percent of all patients, whereas 24 percent were overstaged and 8 percent were understaged. CONCLUSION: In restaging irradiated tumors, magnetic resonance imaging had the accuracy of 52 percent in T stage and 68 percent in N stage. Poor agreement between post-combined chemoradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging was observed in both T (k = 0.017) and N (k = 0.031) stages. Most of the inaccuracy in both T and N stages was caused by overstaging. The problem with magnetic resonance imaging was believed to be that it could not completely differentiate fibrosis from viable residual tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 728
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Allen DC, 1999, ULSTER MED J, V68, P17
[2]   Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer: Predictive factors of tumor downstaging and residual tumor cell density (RTCD): Prognostic implications [J].
Berger, C ;
deMuret, A ;
Garaud, P ;
Chapet, S ;
Bourlier, P ;
ReynaudBougnoux, A ;
Dorval, E ;
deCalan, L ;
Huten, N ;
leFloch, O ;
Calais, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (03) :619-627
[3]   Rectal tumour staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography [J].
Blomqvist, L ;
Machado, M ;
Rubio, C ;
Gabrielsson, N ;
Granqvist, S ;
Goldman, S ;
Holm, T .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (04) :653-660
[4]   Preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer: Long-term results of a phase II trial [J].
Bosset, JF ;
Magnin, V ;
Maingon, P ;
Mantion, G ;
Pelissier, EP ;
Mercier, M ;
Chaillard, G ;
Horiot, JC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (02) :323-327
[5]   Effectiveness of preoperative staging in rectal cancer: digital rectal examination, endoluminal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging? [J].
Brown, G ;
Davies, S ;
Williams, GT ;
Bourne, MW ;
Newcombe, RG ;
Radcliffe, AG ;
Blethyn, J ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Rees, BI ;
Phillips, CJ ;
Maughan, TS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (01) :23-29
[6]   Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Brown, G ;
Radcliffe, AG ;
Newcombe, RG ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Bourne, MW ;
Williams, GT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (03) :355-364
[7]   Pathologic downstaging of T3-4NX rectal cancer after chemoradiation:: 5-fluorouracil vs. Tegafur [J].
Calvo, FA ;
Gómez-Espí, M ;
Díaz-González, JA ;
Cantalapiedra, R ;
Marcos, P ;
Alvarado, A ;
Alfonso, PG ;
Herranz, R ;
Alvarez, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1264-1270
[8]   Large villous adenoma in rectum mimicking cerebral hemispheres [J].
Chung, JJ ;
Kim, MJ ;
Lee, JT ;
Yoo, HS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 175 (05) :1465-1466
[9]  
DOUGLASS HO, 1986, NEW ENGL J MED, V315, P1294
[10]   Comparison of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging when staging rectal cancer [J].
Fuchsjäger, MH ;
Maier, AG ;
Schima, W ;
Zebedin, E ;
Herbst, F ;
Mittlböck, M ;
Wrba, F ;
Lechner, GL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (02) :421-427