How accurate is magnetic resonance imaging in restaging rectal cancer in patients receiving preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy?

被引:204
作者
Chen, CC
Lee, RC
Lin, JK
Wang, LW
Yang, SH
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Koo Fdn, Sun Yat Sen Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
rectal adenocarcinoma; preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-004-0851-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Preoperative combined chemoradiotherapy is currently the main neoadjuvant therapy used to treat locally advanced middle and low rectal adenocarcinoma. A restaging work-up with magnetic resonance imaging was hoped to provide information about the effects related to combined chemoradiotherapy. The goal was to evaluate the correlation between pathologically verified tumor stages and clinical stages predicted by magnetic resonance imaging after combined chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Between August 2000 and June 2003, 50 patients with biopsy-proven middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma, with initial stage T3-T4 or N+, MO, were recruited in this series. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging was used to stage the tumor before and after combined chemoradiotherapy. A protocol of the standard external radiation dose and oral combined uracil and 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin was used. The results of magnetic resonance imaging restaging after combined chemoradiotherapy were correlated with the pathologic staging. RESULTS: The overall predictive accuracy in T stage was 52 percent, whereas overstaging and understaging occurred in 38 percent and 10 percent of patients, respectively. Most of the inaccurate T staging was a result of the overstaging of superficial tumors (T0-T2). In N stage, accurate staging was noted in 68 percent of all patients, whereas 24 percent were overstaged and 8 percent were understaged. CONCLUSION: In restaging irradiated tumors, magnetic resonance imaging had the accuracy of 52 percent in T stage and 68 percent in N stage. Poor agreement between post-combined chemoradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging was observed in both T (k = 0.017) and N (k = 0.031) stages. Most of the inaccuracy in both T and N stages was caused by overstaging. The problem with magnetic resonance imaging was believed to be that it could not completely differentiate fibrosis from viable residual tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 728
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Long-term prognostic significance of extent of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy [J].
Ruo, LY ;
Tickoo, S ;
Klimstra, DS ;
Minsky, BD ;
Saltz, L ;
Mazumdar, M ;
Paty, PB ;
Wong, WD ;
Larson, SM ;
Cohen, AM ;
Guillem, JG .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (01) :75-81
[32]   Radio-chemotherapy as a preoperative treatment for advanced rectal cancer.: Evaluation of down-staging and morbidity [J].
Schaffer, M ;
Thoma, M ;
Wilkowski, R ;
Schaffer, P ;
Dühmke, E .
ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 25 (04) :352-356
[33]  
Schiepers C, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V85, P803, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990215)85:4<803::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO
[34]  
2-T
[35]   T-level downstaging and complete pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiation for advanced rectal cancer result in decreased recurrence and improved disease-free survival [J].
Theodoropoulos, G ;
Wise, WE ;
Padmanabhan, A ;
Kerner, BA ;
Taylor, CW ;
Aguilar, PS ;
Khanduja, KS .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (07) :895-903
[36]   Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer [J].
Torricelli, P ;
Pecchi, A ;
Luppi, G ;
Romagnoli, R .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2003, 28 (01) :19-27
[37]   COMBINED RADIATION-THERAPY, MITOMYCIN-C, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL FOR LOCALLY RECURRENT RECTAL-CARCINOMA - RESULTS OF A PILOT-STUDY [J].
WONG, CS ;
CUMMINGS, BJ ;
KEANE, TJ ;
DOBROWSKY, W ;
OSULLIVAN, B ;
CATTON, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (05) :1291-1296