Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs

被引:229
作者
Santos, JC [1 ]
Coloma, LA
Cannatella, DC
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sect Integrat Biol C0930, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Ecuador, Escuela Biol, Quito, Ecuador
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2133521100
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Aposematism is the association, in a prey organism, of the presence of a warning signal with unprofitability to predators. The origin of aposematism is puzzling, because of its predicted low probability of establishment in a population due to the prey's increased conspicuousness. Aposematism is a widespread trait in invertebrate taxa, but, in vertebrates, it is mostly evident in amphibians, reptiles, and fishes. Poison frogs (Dendrobatidae) are one of the most well known examples of the co-occurrence of warning coloration and toxicity. This monophyletic group of mostly diurnal leaf-litter Neotropical anurans has both toxic/colorful and palatable/cryptic species. Previous studies suggested a single origin of toxicity and warning coloration, dividing the family in two discrete groups of primitively cryptic and more derived aposematic frogs. Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses using mostly aposematic taxa supported this conclusion and proposed a single tandem origin of toxicity and conspicuous warning coloration. By using expanded taxon and character sampling, we reexamined the phylogenetic correlation between the origins of toxicity and warning coloration. At least four or five independent origins of aposematism have occurred within poison frogs; by using simulations, we rejected hypotheses of one, two, or three origins of aposematism (P < 0.002). We also found that diet specialization is linked with the evolution of aposematism. Specialization on prey, such as ants and termites, may have evolved independently at least two times.
引用
收藏
页码:12792 / 12797
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference [J].
Pollock, DD ;
Zwickl, DJ ;
McGuire, JA ;
Hillis, DM .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2002, 51 (04) :664-671
[32]   MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution [J].
Posada, D ;
Crandall, KA .
BIOINFORMATICS, 1998, 14 (09) :817-818
[33]  
Rambaut A, 1997, COMPUT APPL BIOSCI, V13, P235
[34]  
Servedio MR, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P751
[35]  
SILLENTULLBERG B, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P293, DOI [10.2307/2409233, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb04133.x]
[36]   The evolution of coloration and toxicity in the poison frog family (Dendrobatidae) [J].
Summers, K ;
Clough, ME .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (11) :6227-6232
[37]  
Swofford David L., 1996, P407
[38]  
SWOFFORD DL, 2002, PAUPASTERICK PHYLOGE
[39]  
TAIGEN TL, 1985, AM ZOOL, V25, P987
[40]   CLUSTAL-W - IMPROVING THE SENSITIVITY OF PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT THROUGH SEQUENCE WEIGHTING, POSITION-SPECIFIC GAP PENALTIES AND WEIGHT MATRIX CHOICE [J].
THOMPSON, JD ;
HIGGINS, DG ;
GIBSON, TJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1994, 22 (22) :4673-4680