Comparison of the kinetics and thermodynamics for methyl radical addition to C=C, C=O, and C=S double bonds

被引:62
作者
Henry, DJ [1 ]
Coote, ML
Gómez-Balderas, R
Radom, L
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Chem, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Chem, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja039139a
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The barriers, enthalpies, and rate constants for the addition of methyl radical to the double bonds of a selection of alkene, carbonyl, and thiocarbonyl species (CH(2)double bondZ, CH(3)CHdouble bondZ, and (CH3)(2)Cdouble bondZ, where Z = CH2, O, or S) and for the reverse beta-scission reactions have been investigated using high-level ab inito calculations. The results are rationalized with the aid of the curve-crossing model. The addition reactions proceed via early transition structures in all cases. The barriers for addition of methyl radical to Cdouble bondC bonds are largely determined by the reaction exothermicities. Addition to the unsubstituted carbon center of Cdouble bondC double bonds is favored over addition to the substituted carbon center, both kinetically (lower barriers) and thermodynamically (greater exothermicities). The barriers for addition to Cdouble bondO bonds are influenced by both the reaction exothermicity and the singlet-triplet gap of the substrate. Addition to the carbon center is favored over addition to the oxygen, also both thermodynamically and kinetically. For the thiocarbonyl systems, addition to the carbon center is thermodynamically favored over addition to sulfur. However, in this case, the reaction is contrathermodynamic, addition to the sulfur center having a lower barrier due to spin density considerations. Entropic differences among corresponding addition and beta-scission reactions are relatively minor, and the differences in reaction rates are thus dominated by differences in the respective reaction barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:1732 / 1740
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
BACSKAY GB, UNPUB
[2]  
Bader R. F. W., 1990, ATOMS MOL QUANTUM TH, V22
[3]  
Caralp F, 1999, PHYS CHEM CHEM PHYS, V1, P2935
[4]   Ab intio and kinetic study on CH3 radical reaction with H2CO [J].
Che, CB ;
Zhang, H ;
Zhang, X ;
Liu, Y ;
Liu, B .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2003, 107 (16) :2929-2933
[5]   Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer: The RAFT process [J].
Chiefari, J ;
Chong, YK ;
Ercole, F ;
Krstina, J ;
Jeffery, J ;
Le, TPT ;
Mayadunne, RTA ;
Meijs, GF ;
Moad, CL ;
Moad, G ;
Rizzardo, E ;
Thang, SH .
MACROMOLECULES, 1998, 31 (16) :5559-5562
[6]   ARRHENIUS PARAMETERS FOR THE ALKOXY RADICAL DECOMPOSITION REACTIONS [J].
CHOO, KY ;
BENSON, SW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS, 1981, 13 (09) :833-844
[7]   Variable trends in R-X bond dissociation energies (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu) [J].
Coote, ML ;
Pross, A ;
Radom, L .
ORGANIC LETTERS, 2003, 5 (24) :4689-4692
[8]   Methyl radical addition to C=S double bonds: Kinetic versus thermodynamic preferences [J].
Coote, ML ;
Wood, GPF ;
Radom, L .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2002, 106 (50) :12124-12138
[9]   Ab initio evidence for slow fragmentation in RAFT polymerization [J].
Coote, ML ;
Radom, L .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 125 (06) :1490-1491
[10]  
COOTE ML, 2003, IN PRESS MACROMOLECU