Assessing Physical Function in Adult Acquired Major Upper-Limb Amputees by Combining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire and Clinical Examination

被引:40
作者
Ostlie, Kristin [1 ]
Franklin, Rosemary J. [1 ]
Skjeldal, Ola H. [3 ,4 ]
Skrondal, Anders [2 ,5 ]
Magnus, Per [2 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, N-2312 Ottestad, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Oslo, Norway
[3] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Dept Res, Brumunddal, Norway
[4] Vestre Viken Hosp Trust, Drammen, Norway
[5] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2011年 / 92卷 / 10期
关键词
Arm; Amputees; Disability evaluation; Range of motion; articular; Rehabilitation; UPPER EXTREMITY; PROSTHESIS USE; REHABILITATION; AMPUTATION; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.019
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100232 [康复医学];
摘要
Ostlie K, Franklin RJ, Skjeldal OH, Skrondal A, Magnus P. Assessing physical function in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees by combining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire and clinical examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1636-45. Objectives: To describe physical function in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees (ULAs) by combining self-assessed arm function and physical measures obtained by clinical examinations; to estimate associations between background factors and self-assessed arm function in ULAs; and to assess whether clinical examination findings may be used to detect reduced arm function in unilateral ULAs. Design: Survey: postal questionnaires and clinical examinations. Setting: Norwegian ULA population. Clinical examinations performed at 3 clinics. Participants: Questionnaires: population-based sample (n=224; 57.4% response rate). Clinical examinations: combined referred sample and convenience sample of questionnaire responders (n=70; 83.3% of those invited). Survey inclusion criteria: adult acquired major upper-limb amputation, resident in Norway, mastering of spoken and written Norwegian. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire, and clinical examination of joint motion and muscle strength with and without prostheses. Results: Mean DASH score was 22.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.3-25.0); in bilateral amputees, 35.7 (95% CI, 23.0-48.4); and in unilateral amputees, 22.1 (95% CI, 19.8-24.5). A lower unilateral DASH score (better function) was associated with paid employment (vs not in paid employment: adjusted regression coefficient [aB]=-5.40, P=.033; vs students: aB=-13.88, P=.022), increasing post-amputation time (aB=-.27, P=.001), and Norwegian ethnicity (aB=-14.45, P<.001). At clinical examination, we found a high frequency of impaired neck mobility and varying frequencies of impaired joint motion and strength at the shoulder, elbow, and forearm level. Prosthesis wear was associated with impaired joint motion in all upper-limb joints (P<.006) and with reduced shoulder abduction strength (P=.002). Impaired without-prosthesis joint motion in shoulder flexion (ipsilateral: aB=12.19, P=.001) and shoulder abduction (ipsilateral: aB=12.01, P=.005; contralateral: aB=28.82, P=.004) was associated with increased DASH scores. Conclusions: Upper-limb loss clearly affects physical function. DASH score limitation profiles may be useful in individual clinical assessments. Targeted clinical examination may indicate patients with extra rehabilitational needs. Such examinations may be of special importance in relation to prosthesis function.
引用
收藏
页码:1636 / 1645
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]
Atkins DJ, 1989, COMPREHENSIVE MANAGE, P11
[2]
The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire - Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients [J].
Atroshi, I ;
Gummesson, C ;
Andersson, B ;
Dahlgren, E ;
Johansson, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 71 (06) :613-618
[3]
BERGER N, 1958, Artif Limbs, V5, P57
[4]
Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective) [J].
Bhaskaranand, K ;
Bhat, AK ;
Acharya, KN .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2003, 123 (07) :363-366
[5]
The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment [J].
Biddiss, Elaine ;
Chau, Tom .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02) :71-84
[6]
Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years [J].
Biddiss, Elaine A. ;
Chau, Tom T. .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 31 (03) :236-257
[7]
Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection [J].
Biddiss, Elaine A. ;
Chau, Tom T. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 3 (04) :181-192
[8]
BURGER H, 1994, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V18, P25
[9]
Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency - acquired and congenital [J].
Datta, D ;
Selvarajah, K ;
Davey, N .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2004, 18 (02) :172-177
[10]
Datta D., 1991, CLIN REHABIL, V5, P311