Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services

被引:103
作者
Adame, M. F. [1 ,2 ]
Hermoso, V. [1 ]
Perhans, K. [3 ]
Lovelock, C. E. [3 ]
Herrera-Silveira, J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] IPN, Ctr Invest & Estudios Avanzados CINVESTAV, Unidad Merida, Yuc 97310, Mexico
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
carbon stocks; hurricanes; mangroves; Marxan; rehabilitation; water quality; wetlands; MANGROVE FORESTS; BIOMASS; BIODIVERSITY; PROTECTION; VEGETATION; PATTERNS; EXCHANGE; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12391
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Selection of areas for restoration should be based on cost-effectiveness analysis to attain the maximum benefit with a limited budget and overcome the traditional ad hoc allocation of funds for restoration projects. Restoration projects need to be planned on the basis of ecological knowledge and economic and social constraints. We devised a novel approach for selecting cost-effective areas for restoration on the basis of biodiversity and potential provision of 3 ecosystem services: carbon storage, water depuration, and coastal protection. We used Marxan, a spatial prioritization tool, to balance the provision of ecosystem services against the cost of restoration. We tested this approach in a mangrove ecosystem in the Caribbean. Our approach efficiently selected restoration areas that at low cost were compatible with biodiversity targets and that maximized the provision of one or more ecosystem services. Choosing areas for restoration of mangroves on the basis carbon storage potential, largely guaranteed the restoration of biodiversity and other ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 502
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[11]  
Barbier EB, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P124, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0124:NBTNDR]2.0.CO
[12]  
2
[13]   ISSUES IN ECOSYSTEM VALUATION - IMPROVING INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKING [J].
BINGHAM, G ;
BISHOP, R ;
BRODY, M ;
BROMLEY, D ;
CLARK, E ;
COOPER, W ;
COSTANZA, R ;
HALE, T ;
HAYDEN, G ;
KELLERT, S ;
NORGAARD, R ;
NORTON, B ;
PAYNE, J ;
RUSSELL, C ;
SUTER, G .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 14 (02) :73-90
[14]  
Bouillon S., 2011, NATURE GEOSCIENCES, V4, P1
[15]   Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [J].
Carpenter, Stephen R. ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Agard, John ;
Capistrano, Doris ;
DeFries, Ruth S. ;
Diaz, Sandra ;
Dietz, Thomas ;
Duraiappah, Anantha K. ;
Oteng-Yeboah, Alfred ;
Pereira, Henrique Miguel ;
Perrings, Charles ;
Reid, Walter V. ;
Sarukhan, Jose ;
Scholes, Robert J. ;
Whyte, Anne .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (05) :1305-1312
[16]   Conservation planning for ecosystem services [J].
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Shaw, M. Rebecca ;
Cameron, David R. ;
Underwood, Emma C. ;
Daily, Gretchen C. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (11) :2138-2152
[17]  
Cintron G., 1984, The mangrove ecosystem: research methods
[18]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[19]   Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming [J].
Crossman, ND ;
Bryan, BA .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 128 (03) :369-383
[20]   Empirical estimate of the reliability of the use of the Point-Centred Quarter Method (PCQM): Solutions to ambiguous field situations and description of the PCQM plus protocol [J].
Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid ;
Koedam, Nico .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 228 (1-3) :1-18