Eliciting Gul's theory of disappointment aversion by the tradeoff method

被引:12
作者
Abdellaoui, Mohammed [2 ]
Bleichrodt, Han [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Econ, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] GREGHEC & HEC Sch Management, CNRS, F-78351 Jouy En Josas, France
关键词
disappointment aversion; tradeoff method; nonexpected utility; probability weighting; sign-dependence; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; EXPECTED UTILITY; PROSPECT-THEORY; RISK-AVERSION; DECISION; CHOICE; UNCERTAINTY; BETWEENNESS; VIOLATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Gul's theory of disappointment aversion (DA) has several attractive features, being intuitive, analytically tractable, and parsimonious. In spite of this, the DA model has received little attention in practical applications, which may be partly due to the absence of a procedure to elicit the model. We show how the tradeoff method, developed by Wakker and Deneffe can be used to elicit DA. Our elicitation method is parameter-free: it requires no assumption about utility and/or disappointment aversion. Quantitative tests of DA in three outcome domains, monetary gains, monetary losses, and life-years, suggest that the DA model is too parsimonious. Of the other models of disappointment aversion that have been proposed in the literature, our data are most consistent with the model of Loomes and Sugden. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 645
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   DISAPPOINTMENT AND DYNAMIC CONSISTENCY IN CHOICE UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
LOOMES, G ;
SUGDEN, R .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1986, 53 (02) :271-282
[22]   OBSERVING DIFFERENT ORDERS OF RISK-AVERSION [J].
LOOMES, G ;
SEGAL, U .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1994, 9 (03) :239-256
[23]   LOTTERY EQUIVALENTS - REDUCTION OF THE CERTAINTY EFFECT PROBLEM IN UTILITY-ASSESSMENT [J].
MCCORD, M ;
DENEUFVILLE, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (01) :56-60
[24]   OPTIMUM CONSUMPTION AND PORTFOLIO RULES IN A CONTINUOUS-TIME MODEL [J].
MERTON, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1971, 3 (04) :373-413
[25]  
MORONE A, 2002, EXPT INVESTIGATION A
[26]   A MIXED FAN HYPOTHESIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR BEHAVIOR TOWARD RISK [J].
NEILSON, WS .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1992, 19 (02) :197-211
[27]   RISK PERCEPTION AND THE ANALYSIS OF RISK ATTITUDES [J].
QUIGGIN, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1981, 25 (02) :160-169
[28]   EXPO-POWER UTILITY - A FLEXIBLE FORM FOR ABSOLUTE AND RELATIVE RISK-AVERSION [J].
SAHA, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1993, 75 (04) :905-913
[29]  
Savage L.J, 1972, The Foundations of Statistics, VSecond
[30]   Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk [J].
Starmer, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2000, 38 (02) :332-382