Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces

被引:196
作者
Guharoy, M [1 ]
Chakrabarti, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Bose Inst, Dept Biochem, Kolkata 700054, W Bengal, India
关键词
protein-protein interaction; hot spots in the interface; residue conservation; crystal packing; quaternary structure prediction;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0505425102
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A core region surrounded by a rim characterizes biological interfaces. We ascertain the importance of the core by showing the sequence entropies of the residues comprising the core to be smaller than those in the rim. Such a distinction is not seen in the 2-fold-related, non physiological interfaces formed in crystal lattices of monomeric proteins, thereby providing a procedure for characterizing the oligomeric state from crystal structures of protein molecules. This method is better than those that rely on the comparison of the sequence entropies in the interface and the rest of the protein surface, especially in cases where the surface harbors additional binding sites. To a good approximation there is a correlation between the accessible surface area lost because of complexation and Delta Delta G values obtained through alanine-scanning mutagenesis (26-38 cal per angstrom 2 of the surface buried) for residues located in the core, a relationship that is not discernable for rim residues. If, however, a residue participates in hydrogen bonding across the interface, the extent of stabilization is 52 cal/mol per 1 angstrom 2 of the nonpolar surface area buried by the residue. As opposed to an amino acid classification used earlier, an environment-based grouping of residues yields a better discrimination in the sequence entropy between the core and the rim.
引用
收藏
页码:15447 / 15452
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist [J].
Aloy, P ;
Russell, RB .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (10) :1317-1321
[2]   Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins [J].
Bahadur, RP ;
Chakrabarti, P ;
Rodier, F ;
Janin, J .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 53 (03) :708-719
[3]   A dissection of specific and non-specific protein - Protein interfaces [J].
Bahadur, RP ;
Chakrabarti, P ;
Rodier, F ;
Janin, J .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 336 (04) :943-955
[4]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[5]   Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces [J].
Bogan, AA ;
Thorn, KS .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 280 (01) :1-9
[6]   Statistical analysis and prediction of protein-protein interfaces [J].
Bordner, AJ ;
Abagyan, R .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 60 (03) :353-366
[7]   Are protein-protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? [J].
Caffrey, DR ;
Somaroo, S ;
Hughes, JD ;
Mintseris, J ;
Huang, ES .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2004, 13 (01) :190-202
[8]   Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites [J].
Chakrabarti, P ;
Janin, J .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 47 (03) :334-343
[9]   Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability [J].
Chakravarty, S ;
Varadarajan, R .
STRUCTURE WITH FOLDING & DESIGN, 1999, 7 (07) :723-732
[10]   HYDROPHOBIC BONDING AND ACCESSIBLE SURFACE-AREA IN PROTEINS [J].
CHOTHIA, C .
NATURE, 1974, 248 (5446) :338-339