Olympic cities: Lessons learned from mega-event politics

被引:211
作者
Andranovich, G
Burbank, MJ
Heying, CH
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Polit Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Portland State Univ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0735-2166.00079
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
As cities compete for jobs and capital in the c unrest of limited federal aid and increasing global economic competition, a new and potentially high-risk strategy for stimulating local economic growth has emerged. This strategy, called the mega-event strategy entails the quest for a high-profile event to serve as a stimulus to, and justification for, local development. We examine how the mega-event strategy has played out in the three US cities with contemporary Olympic experience: Los Angeles (1984), Atlanta (1996), and Salt Lake City(2002). We analyze the approaches taken by these three cities to bidding for and staging an Olympic mega-event. Our comparison focuses on the decade long period that cities use to prepare to host the games. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned and the policy implications of the mega-event strategy on urban politics.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 131
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SPORTS JOBS TAXES EC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, GAMES CITIES PLAY
[3]  
[Anonymous], J TRAVEL RES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, J URBAN AFF, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9906.1987.TB00484.X
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, TOURIST CITY
[6]  
[Anonymous], TOURIST CITY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Southern Hospitality: Tourism and the Growth of Atlanta
[8]   Professional sports as catalysts for metropolitan economic development [J].
Baade, RA .
JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 1996, 18 (01) :1-17
[9]  
BARNES W, 1998, NEW REGIONAL EC US C
[10]  
BEATTIE L, 2000, ANN REPORT STATE OLY