Olympic cities: Lessons learned from mega-event politics

被引:211
作者
Andranovich, G
Burbank, MJ
Heying, CH
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Dept Polit Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Portland State Univ, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0735-2166.00079
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
As cities compete for jobs and capital in the c unrest of limited federal aid and increasing global economic competition, a new and potentially high-risk strategy for stimulating local economic growth has emerged. This strategy, called the mega-event strategy entails the quest for a high-profile event to serve as a stimulus to, and justification for, local development. We examine how the mega-event strategy has played out in the three US cities with contemporary Olympic experience: Los Angeles (1984), Atlanta (1996), and Salt Lake City(2002). We analyze the approaches taken by these three cities to bidding for and staging an Olympic mega-event. Our comparison focuses on the decade long period that cities use to prepare to host the games. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned and the policy implications of the mega-event strategy on urban politics.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 131
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
[31]  
*GOV OFF PLANN BUD, 2000, 2002 OL WINT GAM EC
[32]  
Hall CM, 1996, PRACTISING RESPONSIB
[33]  
Hannigan John., 1998, Fantasy City: Pleasure and Profit in the Postmodern Metropolis
[34]  
Harris R, 2000, CFO-MAG SR FINANC EX, V16, P46
[35]  
HILL A, 1993, ATLANTA J CONST 1119, pA1
[36]  
Hill Christopher R., 1996, OLYMPIC POLITICS
[37]   Mega-events, urban boosterism and growth strategies: An analysis of the objectives and legitimations of the Cape Town 2004 Olympic bid [J].
Hiller, HH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 24 (02) :439-+
[38]  
Holcomb Briavel., 1999, TOURIST CITY, P54
[39]  
Jardine J., 1989, UTAH HOLIDAY 1019, P8
[40]  
Judd DennisR., 1999, TOURIST CITY