Prognostic factors of renal cell carcinoma

被引:85
作者
Méjean, A
Oudard, S
Thiounn, N
机构
[1] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Hop Necker Enfants Malades, Serv Urol, Paris, France
[2] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Serv Oncol, Paris, France
关键词
prognosis; carcinoma; renal cell; disease management; multivariate analysis; kidney;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000051378.14270.2a
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Determination of prognostic factors is essential for the management of renal cell carcinoma. Stage, histological grade and type, and performance status are now well known and commonly used. During the last decade numerous predictors of patient outcome were tested. This review summarizes the most important studies, explores and compares the results, and tries to respond to the question, "Today, what do we expect of clinical, molecular and genetic factors concerning survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma?" Materials and Methods: Based on MEDLINE literature searches we comprehensively reviewed the literature on the prognotic factors associated with the tumor, the patient and the treatment. Results: During the last decades numerous factors have been studied but few of them maintained independent significance in terms of overall survival as assessed by multivariate analysis. Results are more often controversial from one series to another. No known molecular or cytogenetic tumor marker has been identified to help diagnose, manage or confirm renal cell carcinoma remission, progression or relapse. Conclusions: The classical prognostic factors remain histological grade, histological type, performance status, patient age, number and location(s) of metastatic sites, time to appearance of metastases and prior nephrectomy. The only striking advancement during the last few years has been the proven contribution of radical nephrectomy for metastatic disease in patients with good performance status.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 827
页数:7
相关论文
共 117 条
[111]  
Yasunaga Y, 1998, J SURG ONCOL, V68, P11, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199805)68:1<11::AID-JSO4>3.0.CO
[112]  
2-O
[113]  
Yoshino S, 1995, Int J Urol, V2, P156, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1995.tb00445.x
[114]  
Zhang K, 1998, INT J ONCOL, V12, P871
[115]  
Zhou M, 2001, Semin Urol Oncol, V19, P80
[116]   Reevaluation of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 cutoff point at 4.5 rather than 7 cm. Better correlates with clinical outcome [J].
Zisman, A ;
Pantuck, AJ ;
Chao, D ;
Dorey, F ;
Said, JW ;
Gitlitz, BJ ;
de Kernion, JB ;
Figlin, RA ;
Belldegrun, AS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :54-58
[117]   Improved prognostication of renal cell carcinoma using an integrated staging system [J].
Zisman, A ;
Pantuck, AJ ;
Dorey, F ;
Said, JW ;
Shvarts, O ;
Quintana, D ;
Gitlitz, BJ ;
deKernion, JB ;
Figlin, RA ;
Belldegrun, AS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1649-1657