Comparison of coronary artery stenting outcomes in the eras before and after the introduction of drug-eluting stents

被引:51
作者
Hannan, Edward L. [1 ]
Racz, Michael [2 ]
Holmes, David R. [3 ]
Walford, Gary [4 ]
Sharma, Samin [5 ]
Katz, Stanley [6 ]
Jones, Robert H. [7 ]
King, Spencer B., III [8 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Sch Publ Hlth, Rensselaer, NY 12144 USA
[2] New York State Dept Hlth, Albany, NY 12237 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[4] St Josephs Hosp, Syracuse, NY USA
[5] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, New York, NY 10029 USA
[6] N Shore LIJ Hlth Syst, Manhasset, NY USA
[7] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[8] Piedmont Hosp, Fuqua Heart Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
drug-eluting stents; bare metal stents; mortality; myocardial infarction; stents;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.725531
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Few studies have compared medium-term outcomes for drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare metal stents, and most are relatively small randomized controlled trials. Furthermore, since the introduction of DES, there has been increased use and duration of use of clopidogrel, statins, and other evidence-based therapies. The purpose of the present study was to compare outcomes for patients who underwent stenting in the eras before and after the introduction of DES. Methods and Results-New York state patients undergoing stenting in all nonfederal hospitals in the state were studied. Patients were excluded if they had a previous revascularization. Risk factors that were significant predictors of adverse outcomes were used to adjust adverse outcome rates. The study included 11 436 patients who received stents between October 1, 2002, and March 31, 2003, and 12 926 patients who underwent stenting between October 1, 2003, and March 31, 2004. Death rates, the combined end point of death and myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal MI requiring readmission, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization were compared at 2 years. Patients in the DES era had significantly better risk-adjusted outcomes for death/MI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.97), 9.9% versus 10.8%; nonfatal MI requiring readmission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.97); target vessel revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.64), 11.2% versus 17.9%; and target lesion revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.59), 8.4% versus 14.7%. Conclusions-Patients in the DES era experienced lower rates of death/MI, nonfatal MI, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization, but there were no differences in the rates of death. These improvements are likely a result of increased use of clopidogrel, statins, and dual antiplatelet therapy, in addition to the introduction of DES.
引用
收藏
页码:2071 / 2078
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   A comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [J].
Hannan, EL ;
Racz, MJ ;
McCallister, BD ;
Ryan, TJ ;
Arani, DT ;
Isom, OW ;
Jones, RH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 33 (01) :63-72
[12]   A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes for balloon angioplasty and coronary stent placement [J].
Hannan, EL ;
Racz, MJ ;
Arani, DT ;
McCallister, BD ;
Walford, G ;
Ryan, TJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (02) :395-403
[13]   Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitus - The TAXUS-IV trial [J].
Hermiller, JB ;
Raizner, A ;
Cannon, L ;
Gurbel, PA ;
Kutcher, MA ;
Wong, SC ;
Russell, ME ;
Ellis, SG ;
Mehran, R ;
Stone, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (08) :1172-1179
[14]   Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial - A randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis [J].
Holmes, DR ;
Leon, MB ;
Moses, JW ;
Popma, JJ ;
Cutlip, D ;
Fitzgerald, PJ ;
Brown, C ;
Fischell, T ;
Wong, SC ;
Midei, M ;
Snead, D ;
Kuntz, RE .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 109 (05) :634-640
[15]   Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal scents in percutaneous coronary interventions (a meta-analysis) [J].
Indolfi, C ;
Pavia, M ;
Angelillo, IF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (10) :1146-1152
[16]   Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents [J].
Kastrati, Adnan ;
Mehilli, Julinda ;
Pache, Juergen ;
Kaiser, Christoph ;
Valgimigli, Marco ;
Kelbaek, Henning ;
Menichelli, Maurizio ;
Sabate, Manel ;
Suttorp, Maarten J. ;
Baumgart, Dietrich ;
Seyfarth, Melchior ;
Pfisterer, Matthias E. ;
Schoemig, Albert .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (10) :1030-1039
[17]   Meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting stents with bare metal stents [J].
Katritsis, DG ;
Karvouni, E ;
Ioannidis, JPA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (05) :640-643
[18]   Three-year follow-up after implantation of metallic coronary-artery stents [J].
Kimura, T ;
Yokoi, H ;
Nakagawa, Y ;
Tamura, T ;
Kaburagi, S ;
Sawada, Y ;
Sato, Y ;
Yokoi, H ;
Hamasaki, N ;
Nosaka, H ;
Nobuyoshi, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (09) :561-566
[19]   Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden [J].
Lagerqvist, Bo ;
James, Stefan K. ;
Stenestrand, Ulf ;
Lindback, Johan ;
Nilsson, Tage ;
Wallentin, Lars .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (10) :1009-1019
[20]   A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. [J].
Morice, M ;
Serruys, PW ;
Sousa, JE ;
Fajadet, J ;
Hayashi, EB ;
Perin, M ;
Colombo, A ;
Schuler, G ;
Barragan, P ;
Guagliumi, G ;
Molnar, F ;
Falotico, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (23) :1773-1780