A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Repetitive Spinal Magnetic Stimulation in Lumbosacral Spondylotic Pain

被引:28
作者
Lo, Yew L. [1 ]
Fook-Chong, Stephanie [2 ]
Huerto, Antonio P. [3 ]
George, Jane M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Natl Neurosci Inst, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Clin Res, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Pain Management Unit, Singapore 169608, Singapore
关键词
Lumbar Spondolysis; Neuropathic Pain; Trial; Treatment; Magnetic Stimulation; FIELD THERAPY; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01143.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
Objective. Lumbar spondylosis is a degenerative disorder of the spine, whereby pain is a prominent feature that poses therapeutic challenges even after surgical intervention. There are no randomized, placebo-controlled studies utilizing repetitive spinal magnetic stimulation (SMS) in pain associated with lumbar spondylosis. In this study, we utilize SMS technique for patients with this condition in a pilot clinical trial. Methods. We randomized 20 patients into SMS treatment or placebo arms. All patients must have clinical and radiological evidence of lumbar spondylosis. Patients should present with pain in the lumbar region, localized or radiating down the lower limbs in a radicular distribution. SMS was delivered with a Medtronic R30 repetitive magnetic stimulator (Medtronic Corporation, Skovlunde, Denmark) connected to a C-B60 figure of eight coil capable of delivering a maximum output of 2 Tesla per pulse. The coil measured 90 mm in each wing and was centered over the surface landmark corresponding to the cauda equina region. The coil was placed flat over the back with the handle pointing cranially. Each patient on active treatment received 200 trains of five pulses delivered at 10 Hz, at an interval of 5 seconds between each train. "Sham" SMS was delivered with the coil angled vertically and one of the wing edges in contact with the stimulation point. Results. All patients tolerated the procedure well and no side effects of SMS were reported. In the treatment arm, SMS had resulted in significant pain reduction immediately and at Day 4 after treatment (P < 0.05). In the placebo arm, however, no significant pain reduction was seen immediately and at Day 4 after SMS. SMS in the treatment arm had resulted in mean pain reduction of 62.3% postprocedure and 17.4% at Day 4. The placebo arm only achieved pain reduction of 6.1% postprocedure and 4.5% at Day 4. Discussion. This is the first study to show that a single session of SMS resulted in significant improvement of pain associated with lumbar spondylosis in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled setting. The novel findings support the potential of this technique for future studies pertaining to neuropathic pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1045
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
An estimate of placebo effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in epilepsy [J].
Bae, Erica Hyunji ;
Theodore, William H. ;
Fregni, Felipe ;
Cantello, Roberto ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Rotenberg, Alexander .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 20 (02) :355-359
[2]
Synaptic neurone activity under applied 50 Hz alternating magnetic fields [J].
Calvo, AC ;
Azanza, MJ .
COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY C-PHARMACOLOGY TOXICOLOGY & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1999, 124 (01) :99-107
[3]
EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain [J].
Cruccu, G. ;
Aziz, T. Z. ;
Garcia-Larrea, L. ;
Hansson, P. ;
Jensen, T. S. ;
Lefaucheur, J.-P. ;
Simpson, B. A. ;
Taylor, R. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 (09) :952-970
[4]
Grant I.C., 2000, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[5]
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE ANTINOCICEPTIVE EFFECT OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION ON MECHANICALLY EVOKED RESPONSIVENESS OF DORSAL HORN NEURONS IN NEUROPATHIC RATS [J].
LEEM, JW ;
PARK, ES ;
PAIK, KS .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1995, 192 (03) :197-200
[6]
Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain [J].
Lefaucheur, JP ;
Drouot, X ;
Menard-Lefaucheur, I ;
Zerah, F ;
Bendib, B ;
Cesaro, P ;
Keravel, Y ;
Nguyen, JP .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 75 (04) :612-616
[7]
High intensity magnetic stimulation over the lumbosacral spine evokes antinociception in rats [J].
Lin, VWH ;
Hsiao, I ;
Kingery, WS .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (07) :1006-1012
[8]
Magnetic field therapy: A review [J].
Markov, Marko S. .
ELECTROMAGNETIC BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) :1-23
[9]
A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS [J].
Rossi, Simone ;
Ferro, Marisa ;
Cincotta, Massimo ;
Ulivelli, Monica ;
Bartalini, Sabina ;
Miniussi, Carlo ;
Giovannelli, Fabio ;
Passero, Stefano .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (03) :709-716
[10]
Sacral magnetic stimulation for pain relief from pudendal neuralgia and sciatica [J].
Sato, T ;
Nagai, H .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (02) :280-282