Direct real-time PCR quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken fecal and cecal samples by integrate cell concentration and DNA purification

被引:83
作者
Rudi, K
Hoidal, HK
Katla, T
Johansen, BK
Nordal, J
Jakobsen, KS
机构
[1] Norwegian Food Res Inst, MATFORSK, N-1430 As, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Div Mol Biol, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
[3] Prior Norge AS, N-0483 Oslo, Norway
[4] Genpoint AS, N-0884 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.70.2.790-797.2004
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Campylobacter jejuni is a major cause of diarrheal disease and food-borne gastroenteritis. The main reservoir of C jejuni in poultry is the cecum, with an estimated content of 6 to 8 log(10) CFU/g. If a flock is infected with C. jejuni, the majority of the birds in that flock will harbor the bacterium. Diagnostics at the flock level could thus be an important control point. The aim of the work presented here was to develop a complete quantitative PCR-based detection assay for C. jejuni obtained directly from cecal contents and fecal samples. We applied an approach in which the same paramagnetic beads were used both for cell isolation and for DNA purification. This integrated approach enabled both fully automated and quantitative sample preparation and a DNA extraction method. We developed a complete quantitative diagnostic assay through the combination of the sample preparation approach and real-time 5'-nuclease PCR. The assay was evaluated both by spiking the samples with C. jejuni and through the detection of C. jejuni in naturally colonized chickens. Detection limits between 2 and 25 CFU per PCR and a quantitative range of >4 log(10) were obtained for spiked fecal and cecal samples. Thirty-one different poultry flocks were screened for naturally colonized chickens. A total of 262 (204 fecal and 58 cecal) samples were analyzed. Nineteen of the flocks were Campylobacter positive, whereas 12 were negative. Two of the flocks contained Campylobacter species other than C. jejuni. There was a large difference in the C. jejuni content, ranging from 4 to 8 log,0 CFU/g of fecal or cecal material, for the different flocks tested. Some issues that have not yet promoted much attention are the prequantitative differences in the ability of C jejuni to colonize poultry and the importance of these differences for causing human disease through food contamination. Understanding the colonization kinetics in poultry is therefore of great importance for controlling human infections by this bacterium.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 797
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, FOOD MICROBIOLOGY FU
[2]   A 1-year epidemiological study of campylobacters in 18 Swedish chicken farms [J].
Berndtson, E ;
Emanuelson, U ;
Engvall, A ;
DainelssonTham, ML .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1996, 26 (3-4) :167-185
[3]   Campylobacter incidence on a chicken farm and the spread of Campylobacter during the slaughter process [J].
Berndtson, E ;
DanielssonTham, ML ;
Engvall, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 32 (1-2) :35-47
[4]   Resuscitation of 'non-culturable' cells from aged cultures of Campylobacter jejuni [J].
Bovill, RA ;
Mackey, BM .
MICROBIOLOGY-UK, 1997, 143 :1575-1581
[5]   Direct detection of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken cecal contents by PCR [J].
Chuma, T ;
Yano, K ;
Omori, H ;
Okamoto, K ;
Yugi, H .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 59 (01) :85-87
[6]   DETECTION OF THE COCCOID FORM OF CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI IN CHICKEN PRODUCTS WITH THE USE OF THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION [J].
HAZELEGER, W ;
ARKESTEIJN, C ;
TOOROPBOUMA, A ;
BEUMER, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (1-2) :273-281
[7]  
Lázaro B, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P4677
[8]   Rapid identification of Campylobacter spp. by melting peak analysis of biprobes in real-time PCR [J].
Logan, JMJ ;
Edwards, KJ ;
Saunders, NA ;
Stanley, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) :2227-2232
[9]  
Martens H., 2001, MULTIVARIATE ANAL QU
[10]   Campylobacter species and Guillain-Barre syndrome [J].
Nachamkin, I ;
Allos, BM ;
Ho, T .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1998, 11 (03) :555-+