Changes in enforcement styles among environmental enforcement officials in China

被引:46
作者
Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung [1 ]
Fryxell, Gerald E. [2 ]
Van Rooij, Benjamin [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] CEIBS, Dept Management, Pudong 201206, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Sch Law, NL-1012 CN Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE | 2009年 / 41卷 / 11期
关键词
REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; GUANGZHOU; POLICY; POWER; LAW;
D O I
10.1068/a41357
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines changes in enforcement styles among environmental enforcement officials in the context of China's rapidly changing institutional environments, using panel data collected in Guangzhou in 2000 and 2006. Altogether, five enforcement style elements were examined-accommodation, prioritization, educational, formalism, and coercion. It was found that in 2006 respondents reported greater reliance on education, formalism, and coercion than in 2000. During the same period 2000-06, no significant changes were found for the enforcement styles of accommodation and prioritization or in the respondents' perceptions of their organization's enforcement effectiveness. From regression models in which enforcement styles were used to predict perceived organizational enforcement effectiveness, it was observed that the coefficient for formalism had changed substantially over this period, from being significantly negative to significantly positive, which may be evidence of a general shift from 'rule by man' to 'rule by law' in China. This study has benefited from the concept of regulatory enforcement style elements, as it allows for an empirical understanding of regulatory enforcement beyond the common and normative dichotomy of deterrence versus cooperation.
引用
收藏
页码:2706 / 2723
页数:18
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]   Greening without conflict? Environmentalism, NGOs and civil society in China [J].
Ho, P .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2001, 32 (05) :893-921
[22]  
Ho Peter., 2008, CHINAS EMBEDDED ACTI
[23]  
Hutter B., 1989, LAW POLICY, V11, P153, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9930.1989.TB00024.X
[24]  
Jahiel A.R., 1997, CHINA QUART, V149, P81
[25]  
Jahiel AbigailR., 1998, CHINA QUART, V156, P757, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S030574100005133X, 10.1017/S030574100005133X]
[26]  
Kagan R., 1984, Enforcing Regulation
[27]  
Kagan R.A., 1994, Handbook of regulation and administrative law, V383, P383
[28]  
Kagan RobertA., 2000, LAW POLICY, V22, P225, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9930.00092
[29]   Responsive bureaus, equity, and regulatory negotiation: An empirical view [J].
Langbein, LI .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 21 (03) :449-465
[30]  
Lo C., 2003, J PUBLIC POLICY, V23, P81