Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles

被引:445
作者
Hasselloev, Martin [1 ]
Readman, James W. [2 ]
Ranville, James F. [3 ]
Tiede, Karen [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Chem, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Plymouth Marine Lab, Plymouth PL1 3DH, Devon, England
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Dept Chem & Geochem, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Cent Sci Lab, York YO41 1LZ, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ York, Dept Environm, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
nanoparticles; nanoaggregates; nanometrology; analytical chemistry; particle size analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10646-008-0225-x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Environmental risk assessments of engineered nanoparticles require thorough characterization of nanoparticles and their aggregates. Furthermore, quantitative analytical methods are required to determine environmental concentrations and enable both effect and exposure assessments. Many methods still need optimization and development, especially for new types of nanoparticles in water, but extensive experience can be gained from the fields of environmental chemistry of natural nanomaterials and from fundamental colloid chemistry. This review briefly describes most methods that are being exploited in nanoecotoxicology for analysis and characterization of nanomaterials. Methodological aspects are discussed in relation to the fields of nanometrology, particle size analysis and analytical chemistry. Differences in both the type of size measures (length, radius, aspect ratio, etc.), and the type of average or distributions afforded by the specific measures are compared. The strengths of single particle methods, such as electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy, with respect to imaging, shape determinations and application to particle process studies are discussed, together with their limitations in terms of counting statistics and sample preparation. Methods based on the measurement of particle populations are discussed in terms of their quantitative analyses, but the necessity of knowing their limitations in size range and concentration range is also considered. The advantage of combining complementary methods is highlighted.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 361
页数:18
相关论文
共 86 条
[81]  
VONDERKAMMER F, 2005, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V552, P166, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ACA.2005.07.049
[82]   Nanoparticulate iron oxide minerals in soils and sediments: unique properties and contaminant scavenging mechanisms [J].
Waychunas, GA ;
Kim, CS ;
Banfield, JF .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (4-5) :409-433
[83]   Aquatic environmental nanoparticles [J].
Wigginton, Nicholas S. ;
Haus, Kelly L. ;
Hochella, Michael F., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2007, 9 (12) :1306-1316
[84]   Characterisation of nanoparticulate systems by hydrodynamic chromatography [J].
Williams, A ;
Varela, E ;
Meehan, E ;
Tribe, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2002, 242 (1-2) :295-299
[85]   Submicrometer particle sizing by multiangle light scattering following fractionation [J].
Wyatt, PJ .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1998, 197 (01) :9-20
[86]   Experimental determination of the extinction coefficient of CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals [J].
Yu, WW ;
Qu, LH ;
Guo, WZ ;
Peng, XG .
CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS, 2003, 15 (14) :2854-2860