Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer

被引:154
作者
Callagy, Grace M. [1 ]
Webber, Mark J. [1 ]
Pharoah, Paul D. P. [2 ,5 ]
Caldas, Carlos [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Galway, Dept Pathol, Inst Clin Sci, Galway, Ireland
[2] Strangeways Res Lab, Canc Res UK Dept Oncol, Canc Res UK Genet Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge CB2 0RE, England
[4] Canc Res UK Cambridge Res Inst, Li Ka Shing Ctr, Cambridge CB2 0RE, England
[5] Strangeways Res Lab, EPIC, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-8-153
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: A number of protein markers have been investigated as prognostic adjuncts in breast cancer but their translation into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of appropriate validation. Recently, we showed that BCL2 protein expression had prognostic power independent of current used standards. Here, we present the results of a meta-analysis of the association between BCL2 expression and both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in female breast cancer. Methods: Reports published in 1994-2006 were selected for the meta-analysis using a search of PubMed. Studies that investigated the role of BCL2 expression by immunohistochemistry with a sample size greater than 100 were included. Seventeen papers reported the results of 18 different series including 5,892 cases with an average median follow-up of 92.1 months. Results: Eight studies investigated DFS unadjusted for other variables in 2,285 cases. The relative hazard estimates ranged from 0.85-3.03 with a combined random effects estimate of 1.66 (95%CI 1.25-2.22). The effect of BCL2 on DFS adjusted for other prognostic factors was reported in 11 studies and the pooled random effects hazard ratio estimate was 1.58 (95%CI 1.29-1.94). OS was investigated unadjusted for other variables in eight studies incorporating 3,910 cases. The hazard estimates ranged from 0.99-4.31 with a pooled estimate of risk of 1.64 (95%CI 1.36-2.0). OS adjusted for other parameters was evaluated in nine series comprising 3,624 cases and the estimates for these studies ranged from 1.10 to 2.49 with a pooled estimate of 1.37 (95%CI 1.19-1.58). Conclusion: The meta-analysis strongly supports the prognostic role of BCL2 as assessed by immunohistochemistry in breast cancer and shows that this effect is independent of lymph node status, tumour size and tumour grade as well as a range of other biological variables on multi-variate analysis. Large prospective studies are now needed to establish the clinical utility of BCL2 as an independent prognostic marker.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Abdulkader I, 2005, ONCOL REP, V14, P1527
  • [2] Al-Moundhri M, 2003, PATHOL ONCOL RES, V9, P226, DOI 10.1007/BF02893382
  • [3] Berardo MD, 1998, CANCER, V82, P1296, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980401)82:7<1296::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-1
  • [5] Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically localized biomarkers in stage II and stage III breast cancer: A multivariate analysis
    Bhatavdekar, JM
    Patel, DD
    Shah, NG
    Vora, HH
    Suthar, TP
    Chikhlikar, PR
    Ghosh, N
    Trivedi, TI
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 7 (04) : 305 - 311
  • [6] Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999
    Blamey, R. W.
    Ellis, I. O.
    Pinder, S. E.
    Lee, A. H. S.
    Macmillan, R. D.
    Morgan, D. A. L.
    Robertson, J. F. R.
    Mitchell, M. J.
    Ball, G. R.
    Haybittle, J. L.
    Elston, C. W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (10) : 1548 - 1555
  • [7] MicroRNA expression profiling of human breast cancer identifies new markers of tumor subtype
    Blenkiron, Cherie
    Goldstein, Leonard D.
    Thorne, Natalie P.
    Spiteri, Inmaculada
    Chin, Suet-Feung
    Dunning, Mark J.
    Barbosa-Morais, Nuno L.
    Teschendorff, Andrew E.
    Green, Andrew R.
    Ellis, Ian O.
    Tavare, Simon
    Caldas, Carlos
    Miska, Eric A.
    [J]. GENOME BIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (10)
  • [8] Gene signature evaluation as a prognostic tool: challenges in the design of the MINDACT trial
    Bogaerts, Jan
    Cardoso, Fatima
    Buyse, Marc
    Braga, Sofia
    Loi, Sherene
    Harrison, Jillian A.
    Bines, Jacques
    Mook, Stella
    Decker, Nuria
    Ravdin, Peter
    Therasse, Patrick
    Rutgers, Emiel
    van't Veer, Laura J.
    Piccart, Martine
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2006, 3 (10): : 540 - 551
  • [9] Cancer - The molecular outlook
    Caldas, C
    Aparicio, SAJ
    [J]. NATURE, 2002, 415 (6871) : 484 - 485
  • [10] Molecular classification of breast carcinomas using tissue microarrays
    Callagy, G
    Cattaneo, E
    Daigo, Y
    Happerfield, L
    Bobrow, LG
    Pharoah, PDP
    Caldas, C
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2003, 12 (01) : 27 - 34