Present and future of prophylactic antibiotics for severe acute pancreatitis

被引:95
作者
Jiang, Kun [1 ]
Huang, Wei [2 ]
Yang, Xiao-Nan [1 ]
Xia, Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western Med, W China Hosp, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Provinc, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool NIHR Pancreas Biomed Res Unit, Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Liverpool L69 3GA, Merseyside, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Severe acute pancreatitis; Prophylactic antibiotics; Mortality; Meta-analysis; ACUTE NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; CLINICAL-TRIAL; METAANALYSIS; CIPROFLOXACIN; NECROSIS; IMIPENEM;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v18.i3.279
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
AIM: To investigate the role of prophylactic antibiotics in the reduction of mortality of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients, which is highly questioned by more and more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses. METHODS: An updated meta-analysis was performed. RCTs comparing prophylactic antibiotics for SAP with control or placebo were included for meta-analysis. The mortality outcomes were pooled for estimation, and re-pooled estimation was performed by the sensitivity analysis of an ideal large-scale RCT. RESULTS: Currently available 11 RCTs were included. Subgroup analysis showed that there was significant reduction of mortality rate in the period before 2000, while no significant reduction in the period from 2000 [Risk Ratio, (RR) = 1.01, P = 0.98]. Funnel plot indicated that there might be apparent publication bias in the period before 2000. Sensitivity analysis showed that the RR of mortality rate ranged from 0.77 to 1.00 with a relatively narrow confidence interval (P < 0.05). However, the number needed to treat having a minor lower limit of the range (7-5096 patients) implied that certain SAP patients could still potentially prevent death by antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Current evidences do not support prophylactic antibiotics as a routine treatment for SAP, but the potentially benefited sub-population requires further investigations. (C) 2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 284
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]
[Anonymous], 2005, ADV DATA VITAL HLTH
[3]
Prophylactic antibiotics cannot reduce infected pancreatic necrosis and mortality in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Gao, Jun ;
Zou, Duo-wu ;
Li, Zhao-shen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (01) :104-110
[4]
[5]
Carnovale A, 2005, J PANCREAS, V6, P438
[6]
Meta-analysis of prophylactic parenteral antibiotic use in acute necrotizing pancreatitis [J].
Dambrauskas, Zilvinas ;
Gulbinas, Antanas ;
Pundzius, Juozas ;
Barauskas, Giedrius .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2007, 43 (04) :291-300
[7]
Randomized controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis: Relationship between methodological quality and outcome [J].
de Vries, Annemarie C. ;
Besselink, Marc G. H. ;
Buskens, Erik ;
Ridwan, Ben U. ;
Schipper, Maria ;
van Erpecum, Karel J. ;
Gooszen, Hein G. .
PANCREATOLOGY, 2007, 7 (5-6) :531-538
[8]
Delcenserie R, 1996, PANCREAS, V13, P198
[9]
Early antibiotic treatment for severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Dellinger, E. Patchen ;
Tellado, Jose M. ;
Soto, Norberto E. ;
Ashley, Stanley W. ;
Barie, Philip S. ;
Dugernier, Thierry ;
Imrie, Clement W. ;
Johnson, Colin D. ;
Knaebel, Hanns-Peter ;
Laterre, Pierre-Francois ;
Maravi-Poma, Enrique ;
Kissler, Jorge J. Olsina ;
Sanchez-Garcia, Miguel ;
Utzolino, Stefan .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (05) :674-683
[10]
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Ciprofloxacin Prophylaxis in Patients with Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis [J].
Garcia-Barrasa, A. ;
Borobia, F. G. ;
Pallares, R. ;
Jorba, R. ;
Poves, I. ;
Busquets, J. ;
Fabregat, J. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (04) :768-774